Peer-formativity: a framework for academic writing

Rowena Murray, Morag Thow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The system currently deployed to assess research outputs in higher education can influence what, how and for whom academics write; for some it may determine whether or not they write at all. This article offers a framework for negotiating this performative context - the writing meeting. This framework uses the established theoretical underpinning of motivational interviewing, which involves autonomy, self-determination, environmental factors and social support. A study showed that the framework helped academics negotiate performativity and re-connect their writing to their values. In this way, they could both privilege writing that was meaningful to them and meet personal and institutional targets. Writing meetings did this by developing writing-oriented peer relationships, defined in this article as peer-formativity. Using writing meetings, academics can submit for research assessment systems without surrendering to performativity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1166-1179
JournalHigher Education Research & Development
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2014

Keywords

  • values
  • peer support
  • performativity
  • goals
  • writing

Cite this

@article{280ea93e15854432bca63cf3492a6f32,
title = "Peer-formativity: a framework for academic writing",
abstract = "The system currently deployed to assess research outputs in higher education can influence what, how and for whom academics write; for some it may determine whether or not they write at all. This article offers a framework for negotiating this performative context - the writing meeting. This framework uses the established theoretical underpinning of motivational interviewing, which involves autonomy, self-determination, environmental factors and social support. A study showed that the framework helped academics negotiate performativity and re-connect their writing to their values. In this way, they could both privilege writing that was meaningful to them and meet personal and institutional targets. Writing meetings did this by developing writing-oriented peer relationships, defined in this article as peer-formativity. Using writing meetings, academics can submit for research assessment systems without surrendering to performativity.",
keywords = "values, peer support, performativity, goals, writing",
author = "Rowena Murray and Morag Thow",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2014.911252",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1166--1179",
journal = "Higher Education Research & Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

Peer-formativity: a framework for academic writing. / Murray, Rowena; Thow, Morag.

In: Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 33, No. 6, 02.11.2014, p. 1166-1179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer-formativity: a framework for academic writing

AU - Murray, Rowena

AU - Thow, Morag

PY - 2014/11/2

Y1 - 2014/11/2

N2 - The system currently deployed to assess research outputs in higher education can influence what, how and for whom academics write; for some it may determine whether or not they write at all. This article offers a framework for negotiating this performative context - the writing meeting. This framework uses the established theoretical underpinning of motivational interviewing, which involves autonomy, self-determination, environmental factors and social support. A study showed that the framework helped academics negotiate performativity and re-connect their writing to their values. In this way, they could both privilege writing that was meaningful to them and meet personal and institutional targets. Writing meetings did this by developing writing-oriented peer relationships, defined in this article as peer-formativity. Using writing meetings, academics can submit for research assessment systems without surrendering to performativity.

AB - The system currently deployed to assess research outputs in higher education can influence what, how and for whom academics write; for some it may determine whether or not they write at all. This article offers a framework for negotiating this performative context - the writing meeting. This framework uses the established theoretical underpinning of motivational interviewing, which involves autonomy, self-determination, environmental factors and social support. A study showed that the framework helped academics negotiate performativity and re-connect their writing to their values. In this way, they could both privilege writing that was meaningful to them and meet personal and institutional targets. Writing meetings did this by developing writing-oriented peer relationships, defined in this article as peer-formativity. Using writing meetings, academics can submit for research assessment systems without surrendering to performativity.

KW - values

KW - peer support

KW - performativity

KW - goals

KW - writing

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2014.911252

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2014.911252

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1166

EP - 1179

JO - Higher Education Research & Development

JF - Higher Education Research & Development

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 6

ER -