Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial

James Balmer, R.C. Richard Davison, Steve R. Bird

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).

METHODS: Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).

RESULTS: There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32% (95%CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95%CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1485-1490
Number of pages6
JournalMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Volume32
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • SRM power meter
  • reproducibility
  • validity
  • performance

Cite this

@article{768706472b824d3b8c2a40e29d4744a2,
title = "Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).METHODS: Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).RESULTS: There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32{\%} (95{\%}CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95{\%}CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).CONCLUSION: The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time.",
keywords = "SRM power meter, reproducibility, validity, performance",
author = "James Balmer and Davison, {R.C. Richard} and Bird, {Steve R.}",
year = "2000",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1485--1490",
journal = "Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "American College of Sports Medicine",
number = "8",

}

Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial. / Balmer, James; Davison, R.C. Richard; Bird, Steve R.

In: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Vol. 32, No. 8, 01.08.2000, p. 1485-1490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peak power predicts performance power during an outdoor 16.1-km cycling time trial

AU - Balmer, James

AU - Davison, R.C. Richard

AU - Bird, Steve R.

PY - 2000/8/1

Y1 - 2000/8/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).METHODS: Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).RESULTS: There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32% (95%CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95%CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).CONCLUSION: The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time.

AB - PURPOSE: To assess i) the reproducibility of peak power output recorded during a maximal aerobic power test (MAP), and ii) its validity to predict endurance performance during a field based 16.1-km time trial (16.1-km TT).METHODS: Two studies were completed: for part I, nine subjects performed three MAP tests; for part II, 16 subjects completed a MAP test and 16.1-km TT. Power output was recorded using an SRM power meter and was calculated as peak power output (PPO) recorded during 60 s of MAP and mean power output for the 16.1-km TT (16.1-km TT(PO)).RESULTS: There was no difference between PPO recorded during the three MAP trials, mean coefficient of variation for individual cyclists was 1.32% (95%CI = 0.97-2.03), and test-retest reliability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95%CI = 0.96-1.00). A highly significant relationship was found between PPO and 16.1-km TT(PO) (r = 0.99, P < 0.001) but not for PPO and 16.1-km TT time (r = 0.46. P > 0.05).CONCLUSION: The results show that PPO affords a valid and reliable measure of endurance performance which can be used to predict average power during a 16.1-km TT but not performance time.

KW - SRM power meter

KW - reproducibility

KW - validity

KW - performance

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1485

EP - 1490

JO - Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

JF - Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 8

ER -