Not just a talking shop: practitioner perspectives on how communities of practice work to improve outcomes for people experiencing multiple exclusion homelessness

Michelle Cornes, Jill Manthorpe, Catherine Hennessy, Sarah Anderson, Michael Clark, Christopher Scanlon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Within homelessness services recent policy developments have highlighted the need for integration and improved collaborative working and also, the need for “Psychologically Informed Environments” (PIES) in which workers are better equipped to manage the “complex trauma” associated with homelessness. Drawing on the findings of an evaluation of a multi-site development programme, this paper demonstrates how both these policy aspirations might be implemented through a single delivery vehicle (a community of practice). The paper describes how organizational, educational and psychosocial theory was used to inform programme design and reflects on the utility of these approaches in the light of the evaluation findings. It is reported that communities of practice can deliver significant performance gains in terms of building collaborative relationships and opening-up opportunities for interprofessional education and learning. Filling an important knowledge gap, it also suggested how (professional) participation in a community of practice might work to improve outcomes for service users. Most likely we see those outcomes as being linked to tackling exclusion by sustaining the workforce itself, that is in motivating workers to remain engaged and thinking positively in what is an emotionally challenging and stressful job role.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-546
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
Volume 28
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 May 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Homeless Persons
Policy Making
Learning
Education
Wounds and Injuries
Aspirations (Psychology)
Thinking

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • communities of practice
  • complex trauma
  • integration
  • multiple exclusion homelessness
  • outcomes
  • psychologically informed environments

Cite this

Cornes, Michelle ; Manthorpe, Jill ; Hennessy, Catherine ; Anderson, Sarah ; Clark, Michael ; Scanlon, Christopher. / Not just a talking shop : practitioner perspectives on how communities of practice work to improve outcomes for people experiencing multiple exclusion homelessness. In: Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 541-546.
@article{abd071a5a6604fa2821a12dcdb405638,
title = "Not just a talking shop: practitioner perspectives on how communities of practice work to improve outcomes for people experiencing multiple exclusion homelessness",
abstract = "Within homelessness services recent policy developments have highlighted the need for integration and improved collaborative working and also, the need for “Psychologically Informed Environments” (PIES) in which workers are better equipped to manage the “complex trauma” associated with homelessness. Drawing on the findings of an evaluation of a multi-site development programme, this paper demonstrates how both these policy aspirations might be implemented through a single delivery vehicle (a community of practice). The paper describes how organizational, educational and psychosocial theory was used to inform programme design and reflects on the utility of these approaches in the light of the evaluation findings. It is reported that communities of practice can deliver significant performance gains in terms of building collaborative relationships and opening-up opportunities for interprofessional education and learning. Filling an important knowledge gap, it also suggested how (professional) participation in a community of practice might work to improve outcomes for service users. Most likely we see those outcomes as being linked to tackling exclusion by sustaining the workforce itself, that is in motivating workers to remain engaged and thinking positively in what is an emotionally challenging and stressful job role.",
keywords = "collaboration, communities of practice, complex trauma, integration, multiple exclusion homelessness, outcomes, psychologically informed environments",
author = "Michelle Cornes and Jill Manthorpe and Catherine Hennessy and Sarah Anderson and Michael Clark and Christopher Scanlon",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.3109/13561820.2014.917406",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "541--546",
journal = "Journal of Interprofessional Care",
issn = "1356-1820",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

Not just a talking shop : practitioner perspectives on how communities of practice work to improve outcomes for people experiencing multiple exclusion homelessness. / Cornes, Michelle; Manthorpe, Jill; Hennessy, Catherine; Anderson, Sarah; Clark, Michael; Scanlon, Christopher.

In: Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 28, No. 6, 14.05.2014, p. 541-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not just a talking shop

T2 - practitioner perspectives on how communities of practice work to improve outcomes for people experiencing multiple exclusion homelessness

AU - Cornes, Michelle

AU - Manthorpe, Jill

AU - Hennessy, Catherine

AU - Anderson, Sarah

AU - Clark, Michael

AU - Scanlon, Christopher

PY - 2014/5/14

Y1 - 2014/5/14

N2 - Within homelessness services recent policy developments have highlighted the need for integration and improved collaborative working and also, the need for “Psychologically Informed Environments” (PIES) in which workers are better equipped to manage the “complex trauma” associated with homelessness. Drawing on the findings of an evaluation of a multi-site development programme, this paper demonstrates how both these policy aspirations might be implemented through a single delivery vehicle (a community of practice). The paper describes how organizational, educational and psychosocial theory was used to inform programme design and reflects on the utility of these approaches in the light of the evaluation findings. It is reported that communities of practice can deliver significant performance gains in terms of building collaborative relationships and opening-up opportunities for interprofessional education and learning. Filling an important knowledge gap, it also suggested how (professional) participation in a community of practice might work to improve outcomes for service users. Most likely we see those outcomes as being linked to tackling exclusion by sustaining the workforce itself, that is in motivating workers to remain engaged and thinking positively in what is an emotionally challenging and stressful job role.

AB - Within homelessness services recent policy developments have highlighted the need for integration and improved collaborative working and also, the need for “Psychologically Informed Environments” (PIES) in which workers are better equipped to manage the “complex trauma” associated with homelessness. Drawing on the findings of an evaluation of a multi-site development programme, this paper demonstrates how both these policy aspirations might be implemented through a single delivery vehicle (a community of practice). The paper describes how organizational, educational and psychosocial theory was used to inform programme design and reflects on the utility of these approaches in the light of the evaluation findings. It is reported that communities of practice can deliver significant performance gains in terms of building collaborative relationships and opening-up opportunities for interprofessional education and learning. Filling an important knowledge gap, it also suggested how (professional) participation in a community of practice might work to improve outcomes for service users. Most likely we see those outcomes as being linked to tackling exclusion by sustaining the workforce itself, that is in motivating workers to remain engaged and thinking positively in what is an emotionally challenging and stressful job role.

KW - collaboration

KW - communities of practice

KW - complex trauma

KW - integration

KW - multiple exclusion homelessness

KW - outcomes

KW - psychologically informed environments

U2 - 10.3109/13561820.2014.917406

DO - 10.3109/13561820.2014.917406

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 541

EP - 546

JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care

JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care

SN - 1356-1820

IS - 6

ER -