Moral dilemmas of participation in dangerous leisure activities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Participation in risky leisure activities (including so‐called ‘extreme’ sports) has increased in recent years, along with a concomitant growth in the related supporting industries, and in media coverage of events and associated lifestyles. The rise in popularity of dangerous leisure pursuits has led to questions about whether these activities should be regulated, or whether legislation should be enacted to prohibit particular activities. Arguments have centred on harm to individuals, and on the potential costs to others, such as families, rescue workers, and society at large. Very little work has been done on the moral legitimacy of dangerous leisure pursuits, and this paper attempts to address this, using a multidisciplinary approach. The paper evaluates both paternalistic and libertarian approaches, and pursues solutions to the moral problem from both utilitarian (consequence‐based) and deontological (duty‐based) perspectives. It is concluded that mature, rational individuals ought to retain the right to pursue activities that have potential deleterious consequences for themselves. While recognising that individuals ought to concern themselves with the effects of their actions on others, the paper accepts arguments based on autonomy, and defends the right to engage in dangerous leisure activities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-109
Number of pages15
JournalLeisure Studies
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

participation
autonomy
lifestyle
sport
legislation
extreme sports
industry
cost
popularity
legitimacy
coverage
leisure activity
Participation
Leisure activities
Moral dilemmas
worker
event
costs
Leisure
society

Keywords

  • extreme sports
  • risk
  • ethics
  • autonomy

Cite this

@article{c4302a3dd0904841aca38e55af9caf61,
title = "Moral dilemmas of participation in dangerous leisure activities",
abstract = "Participation in risky leisure activities (including so‐called ‘extreme’ sports) has increased in recent years, along with a concomitant growth in the related supporting industries, and in media coverage of events and associated lifestyles. The rise in popularity of dangerous leisure pursuits has led to questions about whether these activities should be regulated, or whether legislation should be enacted to prohibit particular activities. Arguments have centred on harm to individuals, and on the potential costs to others, such as families, rescue workers, and society at large. Very little work has been done on the moral legitimacy of dangerous leisure pursuits, and this paper attempts to address this, using a multidisciplinary approach. The paper evaluates both paternalistic and libertarian approaches, and pursues solutions to the moral problem from both utilitarian (consequence‐based) and deontological (duty‐based) perspectives. It is concluded that mature, rational individuals ought to retain the right to pursue activities that have potential deleterious consequences for themselves. While recognising that individuals ought to concern themselves with the effects of their actions on others, the paper accepts arguments based on autonomy, and defends the right to engage in dangerous leisure activities.",
keywords = "extreme sports, risk, ethics, autonomy",
author = "Steve Olivier",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/02614360500284692",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "95--109",
journal = "Leisure Studies",
issn = "0261-4367",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Moral dilemmas of participation in dangerous leisure activities. / Olivier, Steve.

In: Leisure Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, 20.08.2006, p. 95-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral dilemmas of participation in dangerous leisure activities

AU - Olivier, Steve

PY - 2006/8/20

Y1 - 2006/8/20

N2 - Participation in risky leisure activities (including so‐called ‘extreme’ sports) has increased in recent years, along with a concomitant growth in the related supporting industries, and in media coverage of events and associated lifestyles. The rise in popularity of dangerous leisure pursuits has led to questions about whether these activities should be regulated, or whether legislation should be enacted to prohibit particular activities. Arguments have centred on harm to individuals, and on the potential costs to others, such as families, rescue workers, and society at large. Very little work has been done on the moral legitimacy of dangerous leisure pursuits, and this paper attempts to address this, using a multidisciplinary approach. The paper evaluates both paternalistic and libertarian approaches, and pursues solutions to the moral problem from both utilitarian (consequence‐based) and deontological (duty‐based) perspectives. It is concluded that mature, rational individuals ought to retain the right to pursue activities that have potential deleterious consequences for themselves. While recognising that individuals ought to concern themselves with the effects of their actions on others, the paper accepts arguments based on autonomy, and defends the right to engage in dangerous leisure activities.

AB - Participation in risky leisure activities (including so‐called ‘extreme’ sports) has increased in recent years, along with a concomitant growth in the related supporting industries, and in media coverage of events and associated lifestyles. The rise in popularity of dangerous leisure pursuits has led to questions about whether these activities should be regulated, or whether legislation should be enacted to prohibit particular activities. Arguments have centred on harm to individuals, and on the potential costs to others, such as families, rescue workers, and society at large. Very little work has been done on the moral legitimacy of dangerous leisure pursuits, and this paper attempts to address this, using a multidisciplinary approach. The paper evaluates both paternalistic and libertarian approaches, and pursues solutions to the moral problem from both utilitarian (consequence‐based) and deontological (duty‐based) perspectives. It is concluded that mature, rational individuals ought to retain the right to pursue activities that have potential deleterious consequences for themselves. While recognising that individuals ought to concern themselves with the effects of their actions on others, the paper accepts arguments based on autonomy, and defends the right to engage in dangerous leisure activities.

KW - extreme sports

KW - risk

KW - ethics

KW - autonomy

U2 - 10.1080/02614360500284692

DO - 10.1080/02614360500284692

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 95

EP - 109

JO - Leisure Studies

JF - Leisure Studies

SN - 0261-4367

IS - 1

ER -