Monitoring shrimp behavior in relation to feed provision, location and time of day in an experimental aquaculture pond

Jean-Benoît Darodes de Tailly, Ignacio Martinez Alpiste, Matthew A.G. Owen, Jonas Keitel, Jose M. Alcaraz-Calero, Katherine A. Sloman*, Mhairi E. Alexander

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A primary challenge in penaeid shrimp farming is suboptimal feed utilization, leading to inefficiencies in production. Better insights into shrimp feeding behavior may provide pathways to address these inefficiencies. While previous studies have highlighted the influence of feed dispersal and time of day on penaeid shrimp behavior in controlled settings, comprehensive analyses of their behavior in production ponds remain limited. The aim of this study was to understand shrimp group feeding behavior in ponds, and how this relates to feed provision, location within the pond, and time of day. Three consecutive trials were performed in an experimental aquaculture pond (28 m2) in Zhuhai, China, stocked with juvenile whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (7.1 ± 0.4 g, mean ± S.E.) at 20 ind.m-2. Each trial comprised 7 days of acclimation followed by 6 days of observation. Three underwater cameras were placed on the bottom of the pond at different locations, with feed provided at different pond locations six times a day between 07:00 and 19:00. Shrimp within the field of view for each camera were tracked using a combination of automated (YOLACT, You Only Look At CoefficientTs) and manual techniques, allowing for calculation of key behavioral metrics associated with individual and group behavior. Shrimp gathered in large numbers around the feeding area shortly after feed provision (i.e. 1 min after) and a gradient in shrimp density was found 10 min after feed provision from high densities inside the feeding area (89.8 ± 5.5 ind.m-2) to low densities on the opposite edge of the pond (11.9 ± 2.3 ind.m-2). Shrimp were more evenly distributed across the pond at night compared to daytime. Although no schooling behavior was observed, shrimp movements were on average twice as fast across the whole pond shortly after feed provision compared to before feeding. Movements inside the feeding area were less polarized (i.e. reduced alignment in the animals’ heading direction relative to that of the group) after feed provision. This study provides a first insight into shrimp feeding behavior in aquaculture ponds, which could help with inefficiencies in production of this species.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106636
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume287
Early online date16 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • feeding behavior
  • penaeid shrimp
  • shrimp pond
  • tracking software
  • YOLACT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring shrimp behavior in relation to feed provision, location and time of day in an experimental aquaculture pond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this