Abstract
This study examines the flexibility with which children can use pragmatic information to determine word reference. Extensive previous research shows that children choose an unfamiliar object as referent of a novel name: the disambiguation effect. We added a pragmatic cue indirectly indicating a familiar object as intended referent. In three experiments, preschool children?s ability to take this cue into account was specifically associated with false belief understanding and the ability to produce familiar alternative names (e.g., rabbit, animal) for a given referent. The association was predicted by the hypothesis that all three tasks require an understanding of perspective (linguistic or mental). The findings indicate that perspectival understanding is required to take into account indirect pragmatic information to suspend the disambiguation effect. Implications for lexical principles and socio-pragmatic theories of word learning are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-69 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Child Psychology |
| Volume | 148 |
| Early online date | 22 Apr 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- word learning
- mutual exclusivity bias
- disambiguation effect
- theory of mind
- alternative naming
- pragmatics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Metacognitive developments in word learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver