Mega sport events and spatial management: zoning space across Rio’s 2016 Olympic city

David McGillivray, Michael B. Duignan, Eduardo Mielke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hosting the Olympic Games demands the efficient and effective sequestration of public space across the city to stage official sports, cultural, and commercial activities. Specifically, this paper examines how fast-tracked urban development processes create exclusive, commercial enclaves to maximise leverageable benefits for external actors. We focus on the case of Rio 2016, drawing on: i) observations across the city and event zones, including Live Site, Last Mile, and transit spaces, ii) interviews with key event, policy and visitor economy stakeholders, iii) documentary analysis of Rio’s plans and promises outlined in official bid documentation, and iv) supplementary sources documenting Olympic planning effects. Our findings illustrate how the legal power of the Host City Contract and highly-circumscribed Olympic regulations create the conditions for managing urban space that enables the circulation of visitor flows to - and the containment of consumption within - newly privatised, temporarily constructed urban zones that favour global interests.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalAnnals of Leisure Research
Early online date21 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Olympic Games
zoning
sport
Sports
key event
event
public space
Urban Renewal
management
urban development
documentation
commercial activity
stakeholder
enclave
Contracts
containment
regulation
Documentation
planning
economy

Keywords

  • Mega sport events
  • Spatial management
  • Visitor economy
  • Event zones
  • Visitor circulation and containment
  • Rio 2016 Olympic Games

Cite this

@article{f70f4e6f1a9642a4a71c13959b979bdd,
title = "Mega sport events and spatial management: zoning space across Rio’s 2016 Olympic city",
abstract = "Hosting the Olympic Games demands the efficient and effective sequestration of public space across the city to stage official sports, cultural, and commercial activities. Specifically, this paper examines how fast-tracked urban development processes create exclusive, commercial enclaves to maximise leverageable benefits for external actors. We focus on the case of Rio 2016, drawing on: i) observations across the city and event zones, including Live Site, Last Mile, and transit spaces, ii) interviews with key event, policy and visitor economy stakeholders, iii) documentary analysis of Rio’s plans and promises outlined in official bid documentation, and iv) supplementary sources documenting Olympic planning effects. Our findings illustrate how the legal power of the Host City Contract and highly-circumscribed Olympic regulations create the conditions for managing urban space that enables the circulation of visitor flows to - and the containment of consumption within - newly privatised, temporarily constructed urban zones that favour global interests.",
keywords = "Mega sport events, Spatial management, Visitor economy, Event zones, Visitor circulation and containment, Rio 2016 Olympic Games",
author = "David McGillivray and Duignan, {Michael B.} and Eduardo Mielke",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/11745398.2019.1607509",
language = "English",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "Annals of Leisure Research",
issn = "1174-5398",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Mega sport events and spatial management : zoning space across Rio’s 2016 Olympic city. / McGillivray, David; Duignan, Michael B.; Mielke, Eduardo.

In: Annals of Leisure Research, 21.04.2019, p. 1-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mega sport events and spatial management

T2 - zoning space across Rio’s 2016 Olympic city

AU - McGillivray, David

AU - Duignan, Michael B.

AU - Mielke, Eduardo

PY - 2019/4/21

Y1 - 2019/4/21

N2 - Hosting the Olympic Games demands the efficient and effective sequestration of public space across the city to stage official sports, cultural, and commercial activities. Specifically, this paper examines how fast-tracked urban development processes create exclusive, commercial enclaves to maximise leverageable benefits for external actors. We focus on the case of Rio 2016, drawing on: i) observations across the city and event zones, including Live Site, Last Mile, and transit spaces, ii) interviews with key event, policy and visitor economy stakeholders, iii) documentary analysis of Rio’s plans and promises outlined in official bid documentation, and iv) supplementary sources documenting Olympic planning effects. Our findings illustrate how the legal power of the Host City Contract and highly-circumscribed Olympic regulations create the conditions for managing urban space that enables the circulation of visitor flows to - and the containment of consumption within - newly privatised, temporarily constructed urban zones that favour global interests.

AB - Hosting the Olympic Games demands the efficient and effective sequestration of public space across the city to stage official sports, cultural, and commercial activities. Specifically, this paper examines how fast-tracked urban development processes create exclusive, commercial enclaves to maximise leverageable benefits for external actors. We focus on the case of Rio 2016, drawing on: i) observations across the city and event zones, including Live Site, Last Mile, and transit spaces, ii) interviews with key event, policy and visitor economy stakeholders, iii) documentary analysis of Rio’s plans and promises outlined in official bid documentation, and iv) supplementary sources documenting Olympic planning effects. Our findings illustrate how the legal power of the Host City Contract and highly-circumscribed Olympic regulations create the conditions for managing urban space that enables the circulation of visitor flows to - and the containment of consumption within - newly privatised, temporarily constructed urban zones that favour global interests.

KW - Mega sport events

KW - Spatial management

KW - Visitor economy

KW - Event zones

KW - Visitor circulation and containment

KW - Rio 2016 Olympic Games

U2 - 10.1080/11745398.2019.1607509

DO - 10.1080/11745398.2019.1607509

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - Annals of Leisure Research

JF - Annals of Leisure Research

SN - 1174-5398

ER -