Measurement error associated with spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain

M.A. Jones, G. Stratton, T. Reilly, V.B. Unnithan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: Evidence of the reliability of measurements in children is scarce, particularly in children with low-back pain. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the measurement error associated with repeated measures of spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain by establishing 95% limits of agreement. Methods: A repeated measures study was performed involving 119 children aged 11–16 y. Of this sample 30 subjects reported recurrent low-back pain and were classified as symptomatic, the remaining 89 subjects were asymptomatic. Standardized measures were taken, including the sit-and-reach test, hip range of motion (Leighton flexometer), lumbar flexibility (modified Schöber test) and lateral flexion of the spine. The same experimenter performed all testing, with 1 wk between the repeated measures. Results: Correlation coefficients suggested that all measures exhibited good reliability in both the symptomatic (r= 0.80–0.95) and asymptomatic groups (r= 0.88–0.99). In contrast, the limits of agreement showed that all measures exhibited random error. The magnitude of random error was typically greater in the symptomatic subjects, suggesting that low-back pain may influence the reliability of typical measures used in this population.

Conclusion: The magnitude of error must be interpreted in relation to analytical goals and the expected magnitude of change. In the authors' opinion the error presented appears acceptable for the serial monitoring of patients, although this will depend on the differences in mobility typically found.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1339-1343
Number of pages5
JournalActa Paediatrica
Volume91
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Physiologic Monitoring
Articular Range of Motion
Hip
Spine
Population

Cite this

@article{bd9c132e5e704af494430a23c03f02b2,
title = "Measurement error associated with spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain",
abstract = "Aim: Evidence of the reliability of measurements in children is scarce, particularly in children with low-back pain. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the measurement error associated with repeated measures of spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain by establishing 95{\%} limits of agreement. Methods: A repeated measures study was performed involving 119 children aged 11–16 y. Of this sample 30 subjects reported recurrent low-back pain and were classified as symptomatic, the remaining 89 subjects were asymptomatic. Standardized measures were taken, including the sit-and-reach test, hip range of motion (Leighton flexometer), lumbar flexibility (modified Sch{\"o}ber test) and lateral flexion of the spine. The same experimenter performed all testing, with 1 wk between the repeated measures. Results: Correlation coefficients suggested that all measures exhibited good reliability in both the symptomatic (r= 0.80–0.95) and asymptomatic groups (r= 0.88–0.99). In contrast, the limits of agreement showed that all measures exhibited random error. The magnitude of random error was typically greater in the symptomatic subjects, suggesting that low-back pain may influence the reliability of typical measures used in this population.Conclusion: The magnitude of error must be interpreted in relation to analytical goals and the expected magnitude of change. In the authors' opinion the error presented appears acceptable for the serial monitoring of patients, although this will depend on the differences in mobility typically found.",
author = "M.A. Jones and G. Stratton and T. Reilly and V.B. Unnithan",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb02831.x",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "1339--1343",
journal = "Acta Paediatrica",
issn = "0803-5253",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

Measurement error associated with spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain. / Jones, M.A.; Stratton, G.; Reilly, T.; Unnithan, V.B.

In: Acta Paediatrica, Vol. 91, No. 12, 12.2002, p. 1339-1343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement error associated with spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain

AU - Jones, M.A.

AU - Stratton, G.

AU - Reilly, T.

AU - Unnithan, V.B.

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - Aim: Evidence of the reliability of measurements in children is scarce, particularly in children with low-back pain. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the measurement error associated with repeated measures of spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain by establishing 95% limits of agreement. Methods: A repeated measures study was performed involving 119 children aged 11–16 y. Of this sample 30 subjects reported recurrent low-back pain and were classified as symptomatic, the remaining 89 subjects were asymptomatic. Standardized measures were taken, including the sit-and-reach test, hip range of motion (Leighton flexometer), lumbar flexibility (modified Schöber test) and lateral flexion of the spine. The same experimenter performed all testing, with 1 wk between the repeated measures. Results: Correlation coefficients suggested that all measures exhibited good reliability in both the symptomatic (r= 0.80–0.95) and asymptomatic groups (r= 0.88–0.99). In contrast, the limits of agreement showed that all measures exhibited random error. The magnitude of random error was typically greater in the symptomatic subjects, suggesting that low-back pain may influence the reliability of typical measures used in this population.Conclusion: The magnitude of error must be interpreted in relation to analytical goals and the expected magnitude of change. In the authors' opinion the error presented appears acceptable for the serial monitoring of patients, although this will depend on the differences in mobility typically found.

AB - Aim: Evidence of the reliability of measurements in children is scarce, particularly in children with low-back pain. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the measurement error associated with repeated measures of spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain by establishing 95% limits of agreement. Methods: A repeated measures study was performed involving 119 children aged 11–16 y. Of this sample 30 subjects reported recurrent low-back pain and were classified as symptomatic, the remaining 89 subjects were asymptomatic. Standardized measures were taken, including the sit-and-reach test, hip range of motion (Leighton flexometer), lumbar flexibility (modified Schöber test) and lateral flexion of the spine. The same experimenter performed all testing, with 1 wk between the repeated measures. Results: Correlation coefficients suggested that all measures exhibited good reliability in both the symptomatic (r= 0.80–0.95) and asymptomatic groups (r= 0.88–0.99). In contrast, the limits of agreement showed that all measures exhibited random error. The magnitude of random error was typically greater in the symptomatic subjects, suggesting that low-back pain may influence the reliability of typical measures used in this population.Conclusion: The magnitude of error must be interpreted in relation to analytical goals and the expected magnitude of change. In the authors' opinion the error presented appears acceptable for the serial monitoring of patients, although this will depend on the differences in mobility typically found.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb02831.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb02831.x

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 1339

EP - 1343

JO - Acta Paediatrica

JF - Acta Paediatrica

SN - 0803-5253

IS - 12

ER -