Abstract

The use of heterogeneous taxonomies requires the need of (semi-)automatic information processing and the computation of match scores. Taxonomic heterogeneity occurs in four different categories: terminological heterogeneity (different labels and/or languages are used to describe the concepts), conceptual heterogeneity (contradictory models, including a varying number of hierarchies), syntactical heterogeneity (varying semantic languages used and different syntax), and semiotic heterogeneity (disparate cognitive interpretations and misunderstanding). During the last five years, a large number of matching systems have been proposed, aiming to overcome one or multiple types of taxonomic heterogeneity existing between two taxonomies. The latest best performing matching systems and algorithms now combine multiple matching techniques to ensure the detected alignments, exploit different sources of background knowledge to extract further relations between taxonomy entities, and provide so-called user involvement to correct the resulted correspondences. Based on an analysis of the latest Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) results presented for different tracks and test cases between 2011 and 2015, this chapter provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methods and attempts, as well as recent techniques, and discusses open challenges to each of the taxonomic heterogeneity categories.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTaxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge
Subtitle of host publicationLinked Data, Semantic Web and Heterogeneous Repositories
PublisherSpringer
Pages51-68
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-72209-2
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-72208-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

information processing
evaluation
alignment
state of the art
analysis
need
method
test

Cite this

Angermann, H., & Ramzan, N. (2018). Matching evaluations and datasets. In Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge: Linked Data, Semantic Web and Heterogeneous Repositories (pp. 51-68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72209-2_4
Angermann, Heiko ; Ramzan, Naeem. / Matching evaluations and datasets. Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge: Linked Data, Semantic Web and Heterogeneous Repositories. Springer, 2018. pp. 51-68
@inbook{9d8f10021ac547a8b5ba4e588bc660f7,
title = "Matching evaluations and datasets",
abstract = "The use of heterogeneous taxonomies requires the need of (semi-)automatic information processing and the computation of match scores. Taxonomic heterogeneity occurs in four different categories: terminological heterogeneity (different labels and/or languages are used to describe the concepts), conceptual heterogeneity (contradictory models, including a varying number of hierarchies), syntactical heterogeneity (varying semantic languages used and different syntax), and semiotic heterogeneity (disparate cognitive interpretations and misunderstanding). During the last five years, a large number of matching systems have been proposed, aiming to overcome one or multiple types of taxonomic heterogeneity existing between two taxonomies. The latest best performing matching systems and algorithms now combine multiple matching techniques to ensure the detected alignments, exploit different sources of background knowledge to extract further relations between taxonomy entities, and provide so-called user involvement to correct the resulted correspondences. Based on an analysis of the latest Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) results presented for different tracks and test cases between 2011 and 2015, this chapter provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methods and attempts, as well as recent techniques, and discusses open challenges to each of the taxonomic heterogeneity categories.",
author = "Heiko Angermann and Naeem Ramzan",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-72209-2_4",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-72208-5",
pages = "51--68",
booktitle = "Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "United States",

}

Angermann, H & Ramzan, N 2018, Matching evaluations and datasets. in Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge: Linked Data, Semantic Web and Heterogeneous Repositories. Springer, pp. 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72209-2_4

Matching evaluations and datasets. / Angermann, Heiko; Ramzan, Naeem.

Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge: Linked Data, Semantic Web and Heterogeneous Repositories. Springer, 2018. p. 51-68.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Matching evaluations and datasets

AU - Angermann, Heiko

AU - Ramzan, Naeem

PY - 2018/1/8

Y1 - 2018/1/8

N2 - The use of heterogeneous taxonomies requires the need of (semi-)automatic information processing and the computation of match scores. Taxonomic heterogeneity occurs in four different categories: terminological heterogeneity (different labels and/or languages are used to describe the concepts), conceptual heterogeneity (contradictory models, including a varying number of hierarchies), syntactical heterogeneity (varying semantic languages used and different syntax), and semiotic heterogeneity (disparate cognitive interpretations and misunderstanding). During the last five years, a large number of matching systems have been proposed, aiming to overcome one or multiple types of taxonomic heterogeneity existing between two taxonomies. The latest best performing matching systems and algorithms now combine multiple matching techniques to ensure the detected alignments, exploit different sources of background knowledge to extract further relations between taxonomy entities, and provide so-called user involvement to correct the resulted correspondences. Based on an analysis of the latest Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) results presented for different tracks and test cases between 2011 and 2015, this chapter provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methods and attempts, as well as recent techniques, and discusses open challenges to each of the taxonomic heterogeneity categories.

AB - The use of heterogeneous taxonomies requires the need of (semi-)automatic information processing and the computation of match scores. Taxonomic heterogeneity occurs in four different categories: terminological heterogeneity (different labels and/or languages are used to describe the concepts), conceptual heterogeneity (contradictory models, including a varying number of hierarchies), syntactical heterogeneity (varying semantic languages used and different syntax), and semiotic heterogeneity (disparate cognitive interpretations and misunderstanding). During the last five years, a large number of matching systems have been proposed, aiming to overcome one or multiple types of taxonomic heterogeneity existing between two taxonomies. The latest best performing matching systems and algorithms now combine multiple matching techniques to ensure the detected alignments, exploit different sources of background knowledge to extract further relations between taxonomy entities, and provide so-called user involvement to correct the resulted correspondences. Based on an analysis of the latest Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) results presented for different tracks and test cases between 2011 and 2015, this chapter provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methods and attempts, as well as recent techniques, and discusses open challenges to each of the taxonomic heterogeneity categories.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-72209-2_4

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-72209-2_4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-72208-5

SP - 51

EP - 68

BT - Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge

PB - Springer

ER -

Angermann H, Ramzan N. Matching evaluations and datasets. In Taxonomy Matching Using Background Knowledge: Linked Data, Semantic Web and Heterogeneous Repositories. Springer. 2018. p. 51-68 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72209-2_4