Martians in the playground: researching special educational needs

Anne Pirrie, George Head

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article offers a critique of what has become known as ‘inclusive education’ under the New Labour administration. The initial impetus for the article was a research project designed to ascertain the impact of the ‘presumption of mainstreaming’ contained in Section 15 of the Standards in Scotland’s Schools etc. Act 2000. This stipulates that the needs of disabled children and others with ‘additional support needs’ should be met in mainstream schools. The authors reflect on the implications of this change in terminology, and examine the consequences of the attendant ‘disappearance of disability’. They also explore how ‘inclusion’ became a largely self‐referential concept that has generally failed to attract critical scrutiny. The authors argue that a highly politicised and ideologically‐charged ‘mission inclusion’ has had the unfortunate effect of tightening the boundaries between ‘us’ and ‘them’. This, they argue, is demonstrated by the emergence of a significant new ‘‐ism’—disabilism—at a time when inclusion was already firmly embedded in New Labour policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-31
JournalOxford Review of Education
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

playground
special educational needs
inclusion
New Labour
labor administration
labor policy
technical language
school
research project
disability
act
education

Cite this

@article{b83abe7dc0ca4a12ae772777c009d39b,
title = "Martians in the playground: researching special educational needs",
abstract = "This article offers a critique of what has become known as ‘inclusive education’ under the New Labour administration. The initial impetus for the article was a research project designed to ascertain the impact of the ‘presumption of mainstreaming’ contained in Section 15 of the Standards in Scotland’s Schools etc. Act 2000. This stipulates that the needs of disabled children and others with ‘additional support needs’ should be met in mainstream schools. The authors reflect on the implications of this change in terminology, and examine the consequences of the attendant ‘disappearance of disability’. They also explore how ‘inclusion’ became a largely self‐referential concept that has generally failed to attract critical scrutiny. The authors argue that a highly politicised and ideologically‐charged ‘mission inclusion’ has had the unfortunate effect of tightening the boundaries between ‘us’ and ‘them’. This, they argue, is demonstrated by the emergence of a significant new ‘‐ism’—disabilism—at a time when inclusion was already firmly embedded in New Labour policy.",
author = "Anne Pirrie and George Head",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03054980601119441",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "19--31",
journal = "Oxford Review of Education",
issn = "0305-4985",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Martians in the playground : researching special educational needs. / Pirrie, Anne; Head, George.

In: Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.02.2007, p. 19-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Martians in the playground

T2 - researching special educational needs

AU - Pirrie, Anne

AU - Head, George

PY - 2007/2/1

Y1 - 2007/2/1

N2 - This article offers a critique of what has become known as ‘inclusive education’ under the New Labour administration. The initial impetus for the article was a research project designed to ascertain the impact of the ‘presumption of mainstreaming’ contained in Section 15 of the Standards in Scotland’s Schools etc. Act 2000. This stipulates that the needs of disabled children and others with ‘additional support needs’ should be met in mainstream schools. The authors reflect on the implications of this change in terminology, and examine the consequences of the attendant ‘disappearance of disability’. They also explore how ‘inclusion’ became a largely self‐referential concept that has generally failed to attract critical scrutiny. The authors argue that a highly politicised and ideologically‐charged ‘mission inclusion’ has had the unfortunate effect of tightening the boundaries between ‘us’ and ‘them’. This, they argue, is demonstrated by the emergence of a significant new ‘‐ism’—disabilism—at a time when inclusion was already firmly embedded in New Labour policy.

AB - This article offers a critique of what has become known as ‘inclusive education’ under the New Labour administration. The initial impetus for the article was a research project designed to ascertain the impact of the ‘presumption of mainstreaming’ contained in Section 15 of the Standards in Scotland’s Schools etc. Act 2000. This stipulates that the needs of disabled children and others with ‘additional support needs’ should be met in mainstream schools. The authors reflect on the implications of this change in terminology, and examine the consequences of the attendant ‘disappearance of disability’. They also explore how ‘inclusion’ became a largely self‐referential concept that has generally failed to attract critical scrutiny. The authors argue that a highly politicised and ideologically‐charged ‘mission inclusion’ has had the unfortunate effect of tightening the boundaries between ‘us’ and ‘them’. This, they argue, is demonstrated by the emergence of a significant new ‘‐ism’—disabilism—at a time when inclusion was already firmly embedded in New Labour policy.

U2 - 10.1080/03054980601119441

DO - 10.1080/03054980601119441

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 19

EP - 31

JO - Oxford Review of Education

JF - Oxford Review of Education

SN - 0305-4985

IS - 1

ER -