Low-lying dipole response of 64Ni

M. Müscher, E. Litvinova, R. Schwengner, T. Beck, D. Bemmerer, F. Fiedler, S.W. Finch, U. Friman-Gayer, S. Hammer, J. Isaak, R.V.F. Janssens, A.R. Junghans, N. Kelly, F. Kluwig, Krishichayan, S.E. Müller, O. Papst, K. Römer, D. Savran, M. ScheckT. Schüttler, J. Sinclair, T. Szücs, W. Tornow, A. Wagner, J. Wilhelmy, A. Zilges

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Two complementary real-photon scattering experiments were conducted on the proton-magic 64Ni nucleus to study the dipole response up to its neutron-separation energy of Sn = 9.7 MeV . By combining both measurements, 87 E1 and 23 M1 transitions were identified above 4.3 MeV. The results of the observed M1 transitions were compared to shell-model calculations using two different model spaces. It was found that the inclusion of excitations across the Z = 28 shell gap in the calculations has a large impact. Furthermore, average cross sections for decays to the ground state (elastic transitions) as well as to lower-lying excited states (inelastic decays) were determined. The corresponding E1 channel was compared to calculations within the relativistic equation of motion (REOM) framework. Whereas the calculations of highest possible complexity reproduce the fragmentation and overall behavior of the E1 average elastic cross section well, the predicted absolute cross sections are approximately twice as high as the experimental upper limits even though the latter also include an estimate of the inelastic-decay channel.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number044318
    Number of pages15
    JournalPhysical Review C
    Volume109
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2024

    Keywords

    • Bremsstrahlung cross-section
    • Energy
    • Excitations
    • Nuclei
    • Resonance
    • States
    • Strength

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Low-lying dipole response of 64Ni'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this