Learning approach and its relationship to type of media use and frequency of media-multitasking

Anna S. Law*, Rosemary Stock

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that learning is impaired if students multitask with media while encountering new information. However, some have gone further and suggested that media-multitasking (as a general activity) may have a negative impact on cognitive control processes. If this were the case, students who are heavy media-multitaskers generally would have difficulties with goal-directed behaviour and organising their time effectively to meet their learning goals. The study described here explored links between total levels of self-reported media-multitasking, academic achievement and approaches to learning. Well-established measures of media-multitasking and learning approach were given to 307 students. Total levels of media-multitasking did not relate to either learning approach or academic achievement. However, surface learning approach related negatively to academic achievement and time spent engaging with printed media. Deep learning approach was positively related to time spent using printed media, email and other computer applications. These findings suggest that patterns of media use differ according to current learning approach, and that these patterns may be more relevant for learning than overall tendency to media-multitask.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-138
Number of pages12
JournalActive Learning in Higher Education
Volume20
Issue number2
Early online date27 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • academic achievement
  • higher education
  • leaning approaches
  • media-multitasking
  • media use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning approach and its relationship to type of media use and frequency of media-multitasking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this