Knowledge activism: bridging the research/policy divide

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How research can better inform policy and how policy can have a better research base are longstanding issues both in educational research and across public policy generally. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, this article argues that progress in increasing the impact of research can be made through a clearer understanding of the nature of politics. Arendt's identification of 'persuasion' as the defining activity of the political sphere is used to argue that the communication of research findings, relevant to education policy, must be similarly aligned if it is to be effective. The article views approaches such as knowledge transfer and knowledge exchange as inadequately constructed and instead promotes the concept of 'knowledge activism' as a means by which research evidence can be made operational in political terms. The article acknowledges the risk to academic integrity and objectivity of such overtly political behaviour but argues that remaining outside the political sphere simply guarantees minimal research impact.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-288
JournalCritical Studies in Education
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • educational research
  • evidence
  • impact
  • policymaking
  • politics

Profiles

No photo of Donald Gillies

Donald Gillies

Person: Academic

Cite this