6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Breathlessness, a common symptom in advanced disease, is a distressing, complex symptom that can profoundly affect the quality of one’s life. Evidence suggests that specialist palliative care breathlessness intervention services can improve physical well-being, personal coping strategies and quality of life. In the UK the use of quality improvement methods is well documented in the National Health Service. However, within the independent hospice sector there is a lack of published evidence of using such methods to improve service provision.

Aim
The aim of this project, was to reduce the waiting time from referral to service commencement for a hospice breathlessness service by 40% – from a median of 19.5 to 11.5 working days.

Methods
Using a Quality Planning and systems thinking approach staff identified barriers and blockages in the current system and undertook Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test change ideas. The ideas tested included offering home visits to patients on long term oxygen, using weekly team “huddles”, streamlining the internal referral process and reallocating staff resources.

Results
Using quality improvement methods enabled staff to proactively engage in positive changes to improve the service provided to people living with chronic breathlessness. Offering alternatives to morning appointments; using staff time more efficiently; and introducing accurate data collection enabled staff to monitor waiting times in real time. The reduction achieved in the median waiting time from referral to service commencement exceeded the project aim.

Conclusions
This project demonstrates that quality improvement methodologies can be successfully utilised in a hospice setting to improve waiting times and meet the specific needs of people receiving specialist palliative care.
Original languageEnglish
Article number000582
Number of pages21
JournalBMJ Open Quality
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 May 2019

Fingerprint

Hospices
Dyspnea
Quality Improvement
Referral and Consultation
Palliative Care
Quality of Life
House Calls
National Health Programs
Systems Analysis
Appointments and Schedules
Oxygen

Cite this

@article{6e47a623fbfe46eaa4750efa7c034311,
title = "Improving the waiting times within a hospice breathlessness service",
abstract = "BackgroundBreathlessness, a common symptom in advanced disease, is a distressing, complex symptom that can profoundly affect the quality of one’s life. Evidence suggests that specialist palliative care breathlessness intervention services can improve physical well-being, personal coping strategies and quality of life. In the UK the use of quality improvement methods is well documented in the National Health Service. However, within the independent hospice sector there is a lack of published evidence of using such methods to improve service provision. AimThe aim of this project, was to reduce the waiting time from referral to service commencement for a hospice breathlessness service by 40{\%} – from a median of 19.5 to 11.5 working days. MethodsUsing a Quality Planning and systems thinking approach staff identified barriers and blockages in the current system and undertook Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test change ideas. The ideas tested included offering home visits to patients on long term oxygen, using weekly team “huddles”, streamlining the internal referral process and reallocating staff resources.ResultsUsing quality improvement methods enabled staff to proactively engage in positive changes to improve the service provided to people living with chronic breathlessness. Offering alternatives to morning appointments; using staff time more efficiently; and introducing accurate data collection enabled staff to monitor waiting times in real time. The reduction achieved in the median waiting time from referral to service commencement exceeded the project aim. Conclusions This project demonstrates that quality improvement methodologies can be successfully utilised in a hospice setting to improve waiting times and meet the specific needs of people receiving specialist palliative care.",
author = "Caroline Sime and Stuart Milligan and Kevin Rooney",
note = "Rejected from BMJ Quality & Safety",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000582",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMJ Open Quality",
issn = "2399-6641",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Improving the waiting times within a hospice breathlessness service. / Sime, Caroline; Milligan, Stuart; Rooney, Kevin.

In: BMJ Open Quality , Vol. 8, No. 2, 000582, 29.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the waiting times within a hospice breathlessness service

AU - Sime, Caroline

AU - Milligan, Stuart

AU - Rooney, Kevin

N1 - Rejected from BMJ Quality & Safety

PY - 2019/5/29

Y1 - 2019/5/29

N2 - BackgroundBreathlessness, a common symptom in advanced disease, is a distressing, complex symptom that can profoundly affect the quality of one’s life. Evidence suggests that specialist palliative care breathlessness intervention services can improve physical well-being, personal coping strategies and quality of life. In the UK the use of quality improvement methods is well documented in the National Health Service. However, within the independent hospice sector there is a lack of published evidence of using such methods to improve service provision. AimThe aim of this project, was to reduce the waiting time from referral to service commencement for a hospice breathlessness service by 40% – from a median of 19.5 to 11.5 working days. MethodsUsing a Quality Planning and systems thinking approach staff identified barriers and blockages in the current system and undertook Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test change ideas. The ideas tested included offering home visits to patients on long term oxygen, using weekly team “huddles”, streamlining the internal referral process and reallocating staff resources.ResultsUsing quality improvement methods enabled staff to proactively engage in positive changes to improve the service provided to people living with chronic breathlessness. Offering alternatives to morning appointments; using staff time more efficiently; and introducing accurate data collection enabled staff to monitor waiting times in real time. The reduction achieved in the median waiting time from referral to service commencement exceeded the project aim. Conclusions This project demonstrates that quality improvement methodologies can be successfully utilised in a hospice setting to improve waiting times and meet the specific needs of people receiving specialist palliative care.

AB - BackgroundBreathlessness, a common symptom in advanced disease, is a distressing, complex symptom that can profoundly affect the quality of one’s life. Evidence suggests that specialist palliative care breathlessness intervention services can improve physical well-being, personal coping strategies and quality of life. In the UK the use of quality improvement methods is well documented in the National Health Service. However, within the independent hospice sector there is a lack of published evidence of using such methods to improve service provision. AimThe aim of this project, was to reduce the waiting time from referral to service commencement for a hospice breathlessness service by 40% – from a median of 19.5 to 11.5 working days. MethodsUsing a Quality Planning and systems thinking approach staff identified barriers and blockages in the current system and undertook Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test change ideas. The ideas tested included offering home visits to patients on long term oxygen, using weekly team “huddles”, streamlining the internal referral process and reallocating staff resources.ResultsUsing quality improvement methods enabled staff to proactively engage in positive changes to improve the service provided to people living with chronic breathlessness. Offering alternatives to morning appointments; using staff time more efficiently; and introducing accurate data collection enabled staff to monitor waiting times in real time. The reduction achieved in the median waiting time from referral to service commencement exceeded the project aim. Conclusions This project demonstrates that quality improvement methodologies can be successfully utilised in a hospice setting to improve waiting times and meet the specific needs of people receiving specialist palliative care.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000582

DO - 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000582

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - BMJ Open Quality

JF - BMJ Open Quality

SN - 2399-6641

IS - 2

M1 - 000582

ER -