Improving anaerobic fitness in young basketball players

plyometric vs. specific sprint training

Roni Gottlieb, Alon Eliakim, Asaf Shalom, Antonio Dello-Iacono, Yoav Meckel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Basketball is a game that is typically performed in an intermittent manner, and includes numerous bursts of explosive activity. Thus, implementation of training methods that best develop anaerobic fitness is of significant importance to basketball coaches and players. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of plyometric and specific sprint training, matched for total volume, on the anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Nineteen young (16.3 ± 0.5 years) male basketball players were randomly assigned to either a plyometric training group or a specific sprint training group, and completed two similar fitness tests prior to and following six weeks of training. The two training programs consisted of plyometric jump training (4 sets of 4-6 series with 6 jumps each) and specific sprint training (4 sets of 4-6 × 20 m repetitions). Prior to training there were no baseline differences between the groups in 20 m sprint time (speed test), bounding distance and vertical jump height (power tests), 2×5 m run time (agility test) or suicide run time (basketball-specific anaerobic endurance test). Plyometric training led to a significant improvement only in the suicide test time (1.6 ± 1.6%, p<0.05). Specific sprint training led to a significant improvement in the 20 m sprint time (2.6 ± 1.7%), bounding distance (3.9 ± 3.8%), and suicide test time (1.2 ± 1.1%, p<0.05 for all). However, there was no significant between-group differences in the training effects on any of the anaerobic variables measured. Neither training program had a significant effect on jump height or the 2×5 m run. The study showed that plyometric training and specific sprint training do not differ statistically in enhancing anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Thus, coaches may have the possibility of alternating between these methods during the busy basketball season.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Athletic Enhancement
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Basketball
Plyometric Exercise
Suicide
Education

Keywords

  • Vertical jump
  • Power
  • Speed
  • Explosive activity
  • Agility

Cite this

@article{f5dde6bda63d4c1087773fd9609348d2,
title = "Improving anaerobic fitness in young basketball players: plyometric vs. specific sprint training",
abstract = "Basketball is a game that is typically performed in an intermittent manner, and includes numerous bursts of explosive activity. Thus, implementation of training methods that best develop anaerobic fitness is of significant importance to basketball coaches and players. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of plyometric and specific sprint training, matched for total volume, on the anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Nineteen young (16.3 ± 0.5 years) male basketball players were randomly assigned to either a plyometric training group or a specific sprint training group, and completed two similar fitness tests prior to and following six weeks of training. The two training programs consisted of plyometric jump training (4 sets of 4-6 series with 6 jumps each) and specific sprint training (4 sets of 4-6 × 20 m repetitions). Prior to training there were no baseline differences between the groups in 20 m sprint time (speed test), bounding distance and vertical jump height (power tests), 2×5 m run time (agility test) or suicide run time (basketball-specific anaerobic endurance test). Plyometric training led to a significant improvement only in the suicide test time (1.6 ± 1.6{\%}, p<0.05). Specific sprint training led to a significant improvement in the 20 m sprint time (2.6 ± 1.7{\%}), bounding distance (3.9 ± 3.8{\%}), and suicide test time (1.2 ± 1.1{\%}, p<0.05 for all). However, there was no significant between-group differences in the training effects on any of the anaerobic variables measured. Neither training program had a significant effect on jump height or the 2×5 m run. The study showed that plyometric training and specific sprint training do not differ statistically in enhancing anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Thus, coaches may have the possibility of alternating between these methods during the busy basketball season.",
keywords = "Vertical jump, Power, Speed, Explosive activity, Agility",
author = "Roni Gottlieb and Alon Eliakim and Asaf Shalom and Antonio Dello-Iacono and Yoav Meckel",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.4172/2324-9080.1000148",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Journal of Athletic Enhancement",
issn = "2324-9080",
publisher = "SciTechnol",
number = "3",

}

Improving anaerobic fitness in young basketball players : plyometric vs. specific sprint training. / Gottlieb, Roni; Eliakim, Alon; Shalom, Asaf; Dello-Iacono, Antonio; Meckel, Yoav.

In: Journal of Athletic Enhancement , Vol. 3, No. 3, 06.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving anaerobic fitness in young basketball players

T2 - plyometric vs. specific sprint training

AU - Gottlieb, Roni

AU - Eliakim, Alon

AU - Shalom, Asaf

AU - Dello-Iacono, Antonio

AU - Meckel, Yoav

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Basketball is a game that is typically performed in an intermittent manner, and includes numerous bursts of explosive activity. Thus, implementation of training methods that best develop anaerobic fitness is of significant importance to basketball coaches and players. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of plyometric and specific sprint training, matched for total volume, on the anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Nineteen young (16.3 ± 0.5 years) male basketball players were randomly assigned to either a plyometric training group or a specific sprint training group, and completed two similar fitness tests prior to and following six weeks of training. The two training programs consisted of plyometric jump training (4 sets of 4-6 series with 6 jumps each) and specific sprint training (4 sets of 4-6 × 20 m repetitions). Prior to training there were no baseline differences between the groups in 20 m sprint time (speed test), bounding distance and vertical jump height (power tests), 2×5 m run time (agility test) or suicide run time (basketball-specific anaerobic endurance test). Plyometric training led to a significant improvement only in the suicide test time (1.6 ± 1.6%, p<0.05). Specific sprint training led to a significant improvement in the 20 m sprint time (2.6 ± 1.7%), bounding distance (3.9 ± 3.8%), and suicide test time (1.2 ± 1.1%, p<0.05 for all). However, there was no significant between-group differences in the training effects on any of the anaerobic variables measured. Neither training program had a significant effect on jump height or the 2×5 m run. The study showed that plyometric training and specific sprint training do not differ statistically in enhancing anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Thus, coaches may have the possibility of alternating between these methods during the busy basketball season.

AB - Basketball is a game that is typically performed in an intermittent manner, and includes numerous bursts of explosive activity. Thus, implementation of training methods that best develop anaerobic fitness is of significant importance to basketball coaches and players. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of plyometric and specific sprint training, matched for total volume, on the anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Nineteen young (16.3 ± 0.5 years) male basketball players were randomly assigned to either a plyometric training group or a specific sprint training group, and completed two similar fitness tests prior to and following six weeks of training. The two training programs consisted of plyometric jump training (4 sets of 4-6 series with 6 jumps each) and specific sprint training (4 sets of 4-6 × 20 m repetitions). Prior to training there were no baseline differences between the groups in 20 m sprint time (speed test), bounding distance and vertical jump height (power tests), 2×5 m run time (agility test) or suicide run time (basketball-specific anaerobic endurance test). Plyometric training led to a significant improvement only in the suicide test time (1.6 ± 1.6%, p<0.05). Specific sprint training led to a significant improvement in the 20 m sprint time (2.6 ± 1.7%), bounding distance (3.9 ± 3.8%), and suicide test time (1.2 ± 1.1%, p<0.05 for all). However, there was no significant between-group differences in the training effects on any of the anaerobic variables measured. Neither training program had a significant effect on jump height or the 2×5 m run. The study showed that plyometric training and specific sprint training do not differ statistically in enhancing anaerobic fitness of young basketball players. Thus, coaches may have the possibility of alternating between these methods during the busy basketball season.

KW - Vertical jump

KW - Power

KW - Speed

KW - Explosive activity

KW - Agility

U2 - 10.4172/2324-9080.1000148

DO - 10.4172/2324-9080.1000148

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Journal of Athletic Enhancement

JF - Journal of Athletic Enhancement

SN - 2324-9080

IS - 3

ER -