Illness monitoring in team sports using a web-based training diary

Brian Cunniffe, Hywel Griffiths, Wayne Proctor, Ken Jones, Julien Baker, Bruce Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective
Use of Web-based data recording systems has received little attention in sport. An “online” training diary could provide a valuable alternative to pen-paper methods in the regular assessment of physical activity and illness occurrence in athletes. The objective of this study was to design and implement a user-friendly and efficient system to monitor incidences of illness in team sport athletes.

DesignProspective monitoring study over a 48-week rugby season. Players were asked to register presence/absence of weekly illness symptoms with medical staff and also use an online training diary. Submitted self-reported diary illness data were compared with illness complaint data recorded by medical staff. Diary response rates were calculated from the number of completed diary entries against the number of available/required entries over the season.

Setting
Web-based training diary.

ParticipantsThirty professional rugby union players.

InterventionComparison of gastrointestinal and upper respiratory illnesses (URIs) reported by players using an online diary and to medical staff.

Main Outcome MeasuresIncidences of URIs.

Results
The diary response rate in the reporting of weekly illnesses was 79% over the study period. Discrepancy existed between the number of self-reported URIs by players using the diary (118 URI incidences) compared with those reported to medical staff (23 URI incidences). Totaling all URI episodes (those self-reported + those registered by medical staff) revealed that players reported just 19% of URI episodes to medical staff.

ConclusionsPlayers tend to underreport incidences of banal infections. Closer monitoring of self-reported illnesses using a similar system in the present study may provide a better alternative to previous methods in nonclinical illness assessment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-481
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Medical Staff
Sports
Football
Incidence
Athletes
Information Systems
Exercise
Infection

Cite this

Cunniffe, Brian ; Griffiths, Hywel ; Proctor, Wayne ; Jones, Ken ; Baker, Julien ; Davies, Bruce. / Illness monitoring in team sports using a web-based training diary. In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 476-481.
@article{909d1a392e87403b9b8daaf956bfc824,
title = "Illness monitoring in team sports using a web-based training diary",
abstract = "ObjectiveUse of Web-based data recording systems has received little attention in sport. An “online” training diary could provide a valuable alternative to pen-paper methods in the regular assessment of physical activity and illness occurrence in athletes. The objective of this study was to design and implement a user-friendly and efficient system to monitor incidences of illness in team sport athletes.DesignProspective monitoring study over a 48-week rugby season. Players were asked to register presence/absence of weekly illness symptoms with medical staff and also use an online training diary. Submitted self-reported diary illness data were compared with illness complaint data recorded by medical staff. Diary response rates were calculated from the number of completed diary entries against the number of available/required entries over the season.SettingWeb-based training diary.ParticipantsThirty professional rugby union players.InterventionComparison of gastrointestinal and upper respiratory illnesses (URIs) reported by players using an online diary and to medical staff.Main Outcome MeasuresIncidences of URIs.ResultsThe diary response rate in the reporting of weekly illnesses was 79{\%} over the study period. Discrepancy existed between the number of self-reported URIs by players using the diary (118 URI incidences) compared with those reported to medical staff (23 URI incidences). Totaling all URI episodes (those self-reported + those registered by medical staff) revealed that players reported just 19{\%} of URI episodes to medical staff.ConclusionsPlayers tend to underreport incidences of banal infections. Closer monitoring of self-reported illnesses using a similar system in the present study may provide a better alternative to previous methods in nonclinical illness assessment.",
author = "Brian Cunniffe and Hywel Griffiths and Wayne Proctor and Ken Jones and Julien Baker and Bruce Davies",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181c125d3",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "476--481",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine",
issn = "1050-642X",
publisher = "Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Illness monitoring in team sports using a web-based training diary. / Cunniffe, Brian; Griffiths, Hywel; Proctor, Wayne; Jones, Ken; Baker, Julien; Davies, Bruce.

In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.11.2009, p. 476-481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Illness monitoring in team sports using a web-based training diary

AU - Cunniffe, Brian

AU - Griffiths, Hywel

AU - Proctor, Wayne

AU - Jones, Ken

AU - Baker, Julien

AU - Davies, Bruce

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - ObjectiveUse of Web-based data recording systems has received little attention in sport. An “online” training diary could provide a valuable alternative to pen-paper methods in the regular assessment of physical activity and illness occurrence in athletes. The objective of this study was to design and implement a user-friendly and efficient system to monitor incidences of illness in team sport athletes.DesignProspective monitoring study over a 48-week rugby season. Players were asked to register presence/absence of weekly illness symptoms with medical staff and also use an online training diary. Submitted self-reported diary illness data were compared with illness complaint data recorded by medical staff. Diary response rates were calculated from the number of completed diary entries against the number of available/required entries over the season.SettingWeb-based training diary.ParticipantsThirty professional rugby union players.InterventionComparison of gastrointestinal and upper respiratory illnesses (URIs) reported by players using an online diary and to medical staff.Main Outcome MeasuresIncidences of URIs.ResultsThe diary response rate in the reporting of weekly illnesses was 79% over the study period. Discrepancy existed between the number of self-reported URIs by players using the diary (118 URI incidences) compared with those reported to medical staff (23 URI incidences). Totaling all URI episodes (those self-reported + those registered by medical staff) revealed that players reported just 19% of URI episodes to medical staff.ConclusionsPlayers tend to underreport incidences of banal infections. Closer monitoring of self-reported illnesses using a similar system in the present study may provide a better alternative to previous methods in nonclinical illness assessment.

AB - ObjectiveUse of Web-based data recording systems has received little attention in sport. An “online” training diary could provide a valuable alternative to pen-paper methods in the regular assessment of physical activity and illness occurrence in athletes. The objective of this study was to design and implement a user-friendly and efficient system to monitor incidences of illness in team sport athletes.DesignProspective monitoring study over a 48-week rugby season. Players were asked to register presence/absence of weekly illness symptoms with medical staff and also use an online training diary. Submitted self-reported diary illness data were compared with illness complaint data recorded by medical staff. Diary response rates were calculated from the number of completed diary entries against the number of available/required entries over the season.SettingWeb-based training diary.ParticipantsThirty professional rugby union players.InterventionComparison of gastrointestinal and upper respiratory illnesses (URIs) reported by players using an online diary and to medical staff.Main Outcome MeasuresIncidences of URIs.ResultsThe diary response rate in the reporting of weekly illnesses was 79% over the study period. Discrepancy existed between the number of self-reported URIs by players using the diary (118 URI incidences) compared with those reported to medical staff (23 URI incidences). Totaling all URI episodes (those self-reported + those registered by medical staff) revealed that players reported just 19% of URI episodes to medical staff.ConclusionsPlayers tend to underreport incidences of banal infections. Closer monitoring of self-reported illnesses using a similar system in the present study may provide a better alternative to previous methods in nonclinical illness assessment.

U2 - 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181c125d3

DO - 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181c125d3

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 476

EP - 481

JO - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

JF - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

SN - 1050-642X

IS - 6

ER -