Identificando fatores de débito técnico em retrospectivas de projetos ágeils

Translated title of the contribution: Identifying technical debt cost factors in reflection activities of an agile projects

Cecilia Nacimento, Jean Carlo Rossa Hauck, Santiago Matalonga

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The Technical Debt metaphor is a field of interest to both the Software Engineering research community and practitioners. The metaphor is used to explain phenomena that occur during software development. This paper studies the application of the metaphor in reflection activities that take place in agile development projects. For this, a qualitative research methodology is applied on retrospective reports of a real software development project. The findings raise evidence of the applicability of the metaphor by identifying the concepts that can be associated with it. Furthermore, the results confirm the applicability of the generating factors of Technical Debit identified in the literature.
Translated title of the contributionIdentifying technical debt cost factors in reflection activities of an agile projects
Original languagePortuguese
Title of host publication2014 Workshop Brazilero en metodos ageils
Pages1-6
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Technical Debt
  • Agile Development
  • Project Reflection
  • Open Coding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying technical debt cost factors in reflection activities of an agile projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Identifying technical debt cost factors in reflection activities of an agile projects

    Translated title of the contribution: Identifying technical debt cost factors in reflection activities of an agile projectsNacimento, C., Matalonga, S. & Rossa Hauck, J. C., 2014, 2014 XL Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI). IEEE, p. 1-11 11 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Cite this