Hybrid seismic testing of cold-formed steel moment resisting frames

Daniel P. McCrum, Jordan Simon, Michael Grimes, Brian M. Broderick, Andrzej Wrzesien, James Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The true seismic performance of three full-scale, 2·2 m high by 3·2 m long, cold-formed steel (CFS), moment-resisting frame structures is investigated for the first time in this paper. In general, shear wall type CFS structures have performed well during earthquake events in the past; however, portal frame CFS type structures have not been investigated to any great degree. Limited cyclic testing of CFS moment-resisting connections/frames has shown the connections/frames perform well. However, these cyclic tests do not take account of inertia forces of the framing structural system. The seismic performance of CFS portal frames was investigated for the first time under true seismic loading using the hybrid test method. Results show that the frames perform well and under extreme loading fail through local buckling of the column section at the column-to-haunch connection. This failure mechanism needs to be prevented as it does not align with the strong column-weak beam design philosophy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-98
Number of pages11
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings
Volume173
Issue number2
Early online date31 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Steel
Testing
Shear walls
Steel structures
Buckling
Earthquakes

Keywords

  • Steel structures
  • Structural frameworks
  • Seismic engineering
  • Fatigue

Cite this

McCrum, Daniel P. ; Simon, Jordan ; Grimes, Michael ; Broderick, Brian M. ; Wrzesien, Andrzej ; Lim, James. / Hybrid seismic testing of cold-formed steel moment resisting frames. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings. 2020 ; Vol. 173, No. 2. pp. 88-98.
@article{1bb308106e45487c94edb618317248b7,
title = "Hybrid seismic testing of cold-formed steel moment resisting frames",
abstract = "The true seismic performance of three full-scale, 2·2 m high by 3·2 m long, cold-formed steel (CFS), moment-resisting frame structures is investigated for the first time in this paper. In general, shear wall type CFS structures have performed well during earthquake events in the past; however, portal frame CFS type structures have not been investigated to any great degree. Limited cyclic testing of CFS moment-resisting connections/frames has shown the connections/frames perform well. However, these cyclic tests do not take account of inertia forces of the framing structural system. The seismic performance of CFS portal frames was investigated for the first time under true seismic loading using the hybrid test method. Results show that the frames perform well and under extreme loading fail through local buckling of the column section at the column-to-haunch connection. This failure mechanism needs to be prevented as it does not align with the strong column-weak beam design philosophy.",
keywords = "Steel structures, Structural frameworks, Seismic engineering, Fatigue",
author = "McCrum, {Daniel P.} and Jordan Simon and Michael Grimes and Broderick, {Brian M.} and Andrzej Wrzesien and James Lim",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1680/jstbu.18.00017",
language = "English",
volume = "173",
pages = "88--98",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings",
issn = "0965-0911",
publisher = "ICE Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Hybrid seismic testing of cold-formed steel moment resisting frames. / McCrum, Daniel P.; Simon, Jordan; Grimes, Michael; Broderick, Brian M.; Wrzesien, Andrzej; Lim, James.

In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, Vol. 173, No. 2, 01.02.2020, p. 88-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hybrid seismic testing of cold-formed steel moment resisting frames

AU - McCrum, Daniel P.

AU - Simon, Jordan

AU - Grimes, Michael

AU - Broderick, Brian M.

AU - Wrzesien, Andrzej

AU - Lim, James

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - The true seismic performance of three full-scale, 2·2 m high by 3·2 m long, cold-formed steel (CFS), moment-resisting frame structures is investigated for the first time in this paper. In general, shear wall type CFS structures have performed well during earthquake events in the past; however, portal frame CFS type structures have not been investigated to any great degree. Limited cyclic testing of CFS moment-resisting connections/frames has shown the connections/frames perform well. However, these cyclic tests do not take account of inertia forces of the framing structural system. The seismic performance of CFS portal frames was investigated for the first time under true seismic loading using the hybrid test method. Results show that the frames perform well and under extreme loading fail through local buckling of the column section at the column-to-haunch connection. This failure mechanism needs to be prevented as it does not align with the strong column-weak beam design philosophy.

AB - The true seismic performance of three full-scale, 2·2 m high by 3·2 m long, cold-formed steel (CFS), moment-resisting frame structures is investigated for the first time in this paper. In general, shear wall type CFS structures have performed well during earthquake events in the past; however, portal frame CFS type structures have not been investigated to any great degree. Limited cyclic testing of CFS moment-resisting connections/frames has shown the connections/frames perform well. However, these cyclic tests do not take account of inertia forces of the framing structural system. The seismic performance of CFS portal frames was investigated for the first time under true seismic loading using the hybrid test method. Results show that the frames perform well and under extreme loading fail through local buckling of the column section at the column-to-haunch connection. This failure mechanism needs to be prevented as it does not align with the strong column-weak beam design philosophy.

KW - Steel structures

KW - Structural frameworks

KW - Seismic engineering

KW - Fatigue

U2 - 10.1680/jstbu.18.00017

DO - 10.1680/jstbu.18.00017

M3 - Article

VL - 173

SP - 88

EP - 98

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings

SN - 0965-0911

IS - 2

ER -