Humans and monsters: reintegrating perpetrators of mass violence to society

Allan T. Moore

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

76 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Crime, and in particular violent crime, is a frequent source of media interest both in the form of factual reporting and fictional portrayal. As explained through an analysis of academic and theoretical literature, media representation has the potential to influence large populations and shape the opinions that mainstream society hold related to the perpetrators of such crimes. Case studies examining the CONTEST counterterrorism strategy in the United Kingdom and the failure of the UK Government to implement this strategy in the manner intended, and strategies for demobilization of perpetrators of genocide in Rwanda are outlined in detail. The case studies are then considered together in terms of how they align with what the underpinning theory argues. Overall conclusions are drawn that success and failure of strategies for reintegration of perpetrators of mass violence are dependent on a combination of state buy-in and destruction of the ‘monster’ narrative associated with fictional and factual media portrayal of perpetrators in the West in particular.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMitigating Mass Violence and Managing Threats in Contemporary Society
EditorsGordon A. Crews, Mary Ann Markey, Selina E.M. Kerr
Place of PublicationHershey, PA
PublisherIdea Group Inc
Chapter9
Pages141-180
Number of pages40
ISBN (Electronic)9781799849582
ISBN (Print)9781799869795, 9781799849575, 1799849570
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 May 2021

Keywords

  • terrorism
  • counterterrorism
  • violence
  • reintegration
  • society
  • radicalisation
  • Begum
  • citizenship
  • contest
  • UK government
  • home secretary
  • Rwanda
  • genocide
  • demobilisation
  • media
  • supreme court

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Humans and monsters: reintegrating perpetrators of mass violence to society'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this