High intensity exercise assessment: relationships between laboratory and field measures of performance

J.S. Baker, B. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between high intensity cycle ergometry when resistive forces were optimised and field tests of high intensity performance in an elite sprint trained group (n=12). Body mass, stature and age of the group were determined prior to testing (66.3±9.8kg, 177±7.6cm and 17±0.74 yrs respectively). Field tests of high intensity performance examined included sprinting, maximal shuttle running and jumping ability (vertical and horizontal). Significant correlations existed between all field tests (P<0.01). Only moderate correlations were observed for values generated on the cycle ergometer and performance tests (P>0.05). The results of the present study suggest that the optimised cycle ergometer test and the performance tests are unrelated when evaluated statistically. These findings also suggest that the sprinting and jumping tests examined are highly related and may be substituted for each other as possible predictors of high intensity ability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-347
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ergometry
Running
Age Groups
Exercise

Cite this

@article{0ae191fc8b544f7fa8ac6f96dad5976b,
title = "High intensity exercise assessment: relationships between laboratory and field measures of performance",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between high intensity cycle ergometry when resistive forces were optimised and field tests of high intensity performance in an elite sprint trained group (n=12). Body mass, stature and age of the group were determined prior to testing (66.3±9.8kg, 177±7.6cm and 17±0.74 yrs respectively). Field tests of high intensity performance examined included sprinting, maximal shuttle running and jumping ability (vertical and horizontal). Significant correlations existed between all field tests (P<0.01). Only moderate correlations were observed for values generated on the cycle ergometer and performance tests (P>0.05). The results of the present study suggest that the optimised cycle ergometer test and the performance tests are unrelated when evaluated statistically. These findings also suggest that the sprinting and jumping tests examined are highly related and may be substituted for each other as possible predictors of high intensity ability.",
author = "J.S. Baker and B. Davies",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1440-2440(02)80022-6",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "341--347",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "4",

}

High intensity exercise assessment : relationships between laboratory and field measures of performance. / Baker, J.S.; Davies, B.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 5, No. 4, 01.12.2002, p. 341-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - High intensity exercise assessment

T2 - relationships between laboratory and field measures of performance

AU - Baker, J.S.

AU - Davies, B.

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between high intensity cycle ergometry when resistive forces were optimised and field tests of high intensity performance in an elite sprint trained group (n=12). Body mass, stature and age of the group were determined prior to testing (66.3±9.8kg, 177±7.6cm and 17±0.74 yrs respectively). Field tests of high intensity performance examined included sprinting, maximal shuttle running and jumping ability (vertical and horizontal). Significant correlations existed between all field tests (P<0.01). Only moderate correlations were observed for values generated on the cycle ergometer and performance tests (P>0.05). The results of the present study suggest that the optimised cycle ergometer test and the performance tests are unrelated when evaluated statistically. These findings also suggest that the sprinting and jumping tests examined are highly related and may be substituted for each other as possible predictors of high intensity ability.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between high intensity cycle ergometry when resistive forces were optimised and field tests of high intensity performance in an elite sprint trained group (n=12). Body mass, stature and age of the group were determined prior to testing (66.3±9.8kg, 177±7.6cm and 17±0.74 yrs respectively). Field tests of high intensity performance examined included sprinting, maximal shuttle running and jumping ability (vertical and horizontal). Significant correlations existed between all field tests (P<0.01). Only moderate correlations were observed for values generated on the cycle ergometer and performance tests (P>0.05). The results of the present study suggest that the optimised cycle ergometer test and the performance tests are unrelated when evaluated statistically. These findings also suggest that the sprinting and jumping tests examined are highly related and may be substituted for each other as possible predictors of high intensity ability.

U2 - 10.1016/S1440-2440(02)80022-6

DO - 10.1016/S1440-2440(02)80022-6

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 341

EP - 347

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 4

ER -