TY - JOUR
T1 - Hall versus wall doorway collisions
T2 - why aren’t they right?
AU - Hatin, Bianca
AU - Sykes Tottenham, Laurie
AU - Oriet, Chris
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - When walking through a doorway, research has demonstrated predominately rightward collisions, although a recent study found consistent leftward collisions. We tested whether this discrepancy resulted from differences across the testing environments (hall/wall; environmental cues) and whether it was influenced by direction of attention (up/down/straight ahead). Significant leftward biases were observed for the hall doorway; no bias was observed for the wall doorway. Environmental cues, but not direction of attention, strongly modulated hall performance only. However, neither factor explains why different studies yield different directional collision biases.
AB - When walking through a doorway, research has demonstrated predominately rightward collisions, although a recent study found consistent leftward collisions. We tested whether this discrepancy resulted from differences across the testing environments (hall/wall; environmental cues) and whether it was influenced by direction of attention (up/down/straight ahead). Significant leftward biases were observed for the hall doorway; no bias was observed for the wall doorway. Environmental cues, but not direction of attention, strongly modulated hall performance only. However, neither factor explains why different studies yield different directional collision biases.
M3 - Meeting Abstract
SN - 1878-7290
VL - 66
JO - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology
ER -