Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gender Dysphoria in children and young people: the implications for clinical staff of the Bell V’s Tavistock Judicial Review and Appeal Ruling

  • Laura Jackson
  • , Robin Ion
  • , Sinead Helyar*
  • , Leanne Patrick
  • , Andy Hill
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

    40 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In the past few years, there has been a very significant rise in the number of children and young people seeking treatment for gender dysphoria. This area is the subject of much discussion, as evidenced in a recent court case in the UK which examined competence and capacity of young people to consent to potentially irreversible interventions. Clinicians involved in gaining consent to puberty blockers for gender dysphoric young people, must understand the evidence in this area and be aware of the heavy burden of accountability placed upon them.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)e11-e13
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
    Volume31
    Issue number9-10
    Early online date9 Dec 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2022

    Keywords

    • children
    • young people
    • puberty blockers
    • cross sex hormones
    • consent
    • gillick competence
    • evidence based care
    • long term outcomes
    • gender dysphoria

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Dysphoria in children and young people: the implications for clinical staff of the Bell V’s Tavistock Judicial Review and Appeal Ruling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this