Gender Dysphoria in children and young people: the implications for clinical staff of the Bell V’s Tavistock Judicial Review and Appeal Ruling

Laura Jackson, Robin Ion, Sinead Helyar*, Leanne Patrick, Andy Hill

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

2 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the past few years, there has been a very significant rise in the number of children and young people seeking treatment for gender dysphoria. This area is the subject of much discussion, as evidenced in a recent court case in the UK which examined competence and capacity of young people to consent to potentially irreversible interventions. Clinicians involved in gaining consent to puberty blockers for gender dysphoric young people, must understand the evidence in this area and be aware of the heavy burden of accountability placed upon them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e11-e13
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume31
Issue number9-10
Early online date9 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2022

Keywords

  • children
  • young people
  • puberty blockers
  • cross sex hormones
  • consent
  • gillick competence
  • evidence based care
  • long term outcomes
  • gender dysphoria

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender Dysphoria in children and young people: the implications for clinical staff of the Bell V’s Tavistock Judicial Review and Appeal Ruling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this