Further mechanical considerations between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity

R.S. Gordon; K.L. Franklin; B. Davies; J.S. Baker

doi:10.1080/15438620701525540

Further mechanical considerations between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity

R.S. Gordon, K.L. Franklin, B. Davies, J.S. Baker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to outline mechanical issues related to the use of the Polar S710 heart monitor with Power Unit when compared with the SRM Powercrank system. There are issues outlined in this article that refer to the suitability of the Polar S710 for the quantification of performance during downhill cycling that relate to chain vibration, chain tension, and time interval sampling rates.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	241-247
Number of pages	7
Journal	Research in Sports Medicine
Volume	15
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620701525540
Publication status	Published - 21 Dec 2007
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

power
torque
instrumentation
vibration
mechanical analysis

Access to Document

10.1080/15438620701525540

Cite this

@article{99aa20c3528948ca9df92dca8fdb45f6,

title = "Further mechanical considerations between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity",

abstract = "The purpose of this article is to outline mechanical issues related to the use of the Polar S710 heart monitor with Power Unit when compared with the SRM Powercrank system. There are issues outlined in this article that refer to the suitability of the Polar S710 for the quantification of performance during downhill cycling that relate to chain vibration, chain tension, and time interval sampling rates.",

keywords = "power, torque, instrumentation, vibration, mechanical analysis",

author = "R.S. Gordon and K.L. Franklin and B. Davies and J.S. Baker",

year = "2007",

month = dec,

day = "21",

doi = "10.1080/15438620701525540",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "241--247",

journal = "Research in Sports Medicine",

issn = "1543-8627",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further mechanical considerations between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity

AU - Gordon, R.S.

AU - Franklin, K.L.

AU - Davies, B.

AU - Baker, J.S.

PY - 2007/12/21

Y1 - 2007/12/21

N2 - The purpose of this article is to outline mechanical issues related to the use of the Polar S710 heart monitor with Power Unit when compared with the SRM Powercrank system. There are issues outlined in this article that refer to the suitability of the Polar S710 for the quantification of performance during downhill cycling that relate to chain vibration, chain tension, and time interval sampling rates.

AB - The purpose of this article is to outline mechanical issues related to the use of the Polar S710 heart monitor with Power Unit when compared with the SRM Powercrank system. There are issues outlined in this article that refer to the suitability of the Polar S710 for the quantification of performance during downhill cycling that relate to chain vibration, chain tension, and time interval sampling rates.

KW - power

KW - torque

KW - instrumentation

KW - vibration

KW - mechanical analysis

U2 - 10.1080/15438620701525540

DO - 10.1080/15438620701525540

M3 - Article

SN - 1543-8627

VL - 15

SP - 241

EP - 247

JO - Research in Sports Medicine

JF - Research in Sports Medicine

IS - 4

ER -

Further mechanical considerations between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this