Flexing Academic Identities: Speaking Truth to Power

Anne Pirrie, Kevin Adamson, Walter Humes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the changing landscape of higher education in the United Kingdom. It challenges the notion that the spread of bureaucratic rationality and the rise of corporate culture have invariably resulted in a loss of meaning in academic life. Drawing upon the work of Onora O'Neill, Max Weber and Jürgen Habermas, the article argues for a more measured response to calls for greater accountability in higher education. The function of university mission groups is also examined, particularly in respect of their role in discursively producing notions of superiority and inferiority in the sector. The authors suggest that it is as much the machinations of influential university mission groups as the ‘iron cage’ of societal rationalisation that have brought about a perceived loss of freedom in academic life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-106
Number of pages10
JournalPower and Education
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

speaking
university
rationalization
rationality
education
Group
responsibility

Cite this

Pirrie, Anne ; Adamson, Kevin ; Humes, Walter. / Flexing Academic Identities : Speaking Truth to Power. In: Power and Education. 2010 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 97-106.
@article{20bedd4140094d83a92a7b99b31259de,
title = "Flexing Academic Identities: Speaking Truth to Power",
abstract = "This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the changing landscape of higher education in the United Kingdom. It challenges the notion that the spread of bureaucratic rationality and the rise of corporate culture have invariably resulted in a loss of meaning in academic life. Drawing upon the work of Onora O'Neill, Max Weber and J{\"u}rgen Habermas, the article argues for a more measured response to calls for greater accountability in higher education. The function of university mission groups is also examined, particularly in respect of their role in discursively producing notions of superiority and inferiority in the sector. The authors suggest that it is as much the machinations of influential university mission groups as the ‘iron cage’ of societal rationalisation that have brought about a perceived loss of freedom in academic life.",
author = "Anne Pirrie and Kevin Adamson and Walter Humes",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2304/power.2010.2.1.97",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "97--106",
journal = "Power and Education",
issn = "1757-7438",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Flexing Academic Identities : Speaking Truth to Power. / Pirrie, Anne; Adamson, Kevin; Humes, Walter.

In: Power and Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 97-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexing Academic Identities

T2 - Speaking Truth to Power

AU - Pirrie, Anne

AU - Adamson, Kevin

AU - Humes, Walter

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the changing landscape of higher education in the United Kingdom. It challenges the notion that the spread of bureaucratic rationality and the rise of corporate culture have invariably resulted in a loss of meaning in academic life. Drawing upon the work of Onora O'Neill, Max Weber and Jürgen Habermas, the article argues for a more measured response to calls for greater accountability in higher education. The function of university mission groups is also examined, particularly in respect of their role in discursively producing notions of superiority and inferiority in the sector. The authors suggest that it is as much the machinations of influential university mission groups as the ‘iron cage’ of societal rationalisation that have brought about a perceived loss of freedom in academic life.

AB - This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the changing landscape of higher education in the United Kingdom. It challenges the notion that the spread of bureaucratic rationality and the rise of corporate culture have invariably resulted in a loss of meaning in academic life. Drawing upon the work of Onora O'Neill, Max Weber and Jürgen Habermas, the article argues for a more measured response to calls for greater accountability in higher education. The function of university mission groups is also examined, particularly in respect of their role in discursively producing notions of superiority and inferiority in the sector. The authors suggest that it is as much the machinations of influential university mission groups as the ‘iron cage’ of societal rationalisation that have brought about a perceived loss of freedom in academic life.

U2 - 10.2304/power.2010.2.1.97

DO - 10.2304/power.2010.2.1.97

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 97

EP - 106

JO - Power and Education

JF - Power and Education

SN - 1757-7438

IS - 1

ER -