Facilitator, director or critical friend? contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper explores the current issues relating to doctoral research supervision and candidature, set within the context of the neo-liberal and consumerist agendas and the pressures of the Research Assessment Exercise. The paper opens up discussion about the extent to which the discourse of performativity may be having an influence on supervision styles, and explores some of the barriers that may prevent the realisation of effective supervisor/student relationships. The paper highlights the evidence arising from a critical review of literature into current supervision styles and candidate needs, explores the way in which these issues may be applied to education and provides illustrative examples of the way in which principles are currently being translated into practice in the Faculty of Education of one Scottish university.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-500
Number of pages12
JournalTeaching in Higher Education
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

supervision
director
education
candidacy
university
discourse
evidence
student
literature

Keywords

  • research
  • supervision
  • relationships

Cite this

@article{2025152540d74aafa07083a724e84657,
title = "Facilitator, director or critical friend?: contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles",
abstract = "This paper explores the current issues relating to doctoral research supervision and candidature, set within the context of the neo-liberal and consumerist agendas and the pressures of the Research Assessment Exercise. The paper opens up discussion about the extent to which the discourse of performativity may be having an influence on supervision styles, and explores some of the barriers that may prevent the realisation of effective supervisor/student relationships. The paper highlights the evidence arising from a critical review of literature into current supervision styles and candidate needs, explores the way in which these issues may be applied to education and provides illustrative examples of the way in which principles are currently being translated into practice in the Faculty of Education of one Scottish university.",
keywords = "research, supervision, relationships",
author = "Ross Deuchar",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/13562510802193905",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "489--500",
journal = "Teaching in Higher Education",
issn = "1356-2517",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Facilitator, director or critical friend? contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. / Deuchar, Ross.

In: Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 4, 26.06.2008, p. 489-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facilitator, director or critical friend?

T2 - contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles

AU - Deuchar, Ross

PY - 2008/6/26

Y1 - 2008/6/26

N2 - This paper explores the current issues relating to doctoral research supervision and candidature, set within the context of the neo-liberal and consumerist agendas and the pressures of the Research Assessment Exercise. The paper opens up discussion about the extent to which the discourse of performativity may be having an influence on supervision styles, and explores some of the barriers that may prevent the realisation of effective supervisor/student relationships. The paper highlights the evidence arising from a critical review of literature into current supervision styles and candidate needs, explores the way in which these issues may be applied to education and provides illustrative examples of the way in which principles are currently being translated into practice in the Faculty of Education of one Scottish university.

AB - This paper explores the current issues relating to doctoral research supervision and candidature, set within the context of the neo-liberal and consumerist agendas and the pressures of the Research Assessment Exercise. The paper opens up discussion about the extent to which the discourse of performativity may be having an influence on supervision styles, and explores some of the barriers that may prevent the realisation of effective supervisor/student relationships. The paper highlights the evidence arising from a critical review of literature into current supervision styles and candidate needs, explores the way in which these issues may be applied to education and provides illustrative examples of the way in which principles are currently being translated into practice in the Faculty of Education of one Scottish university.

KW - research

KW - supervision

KW - relationships

U2 - 10.1080/13562510802193905

DO - 10.1080/13562510802193905

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 489

EP - 500

JO - Teaching in Higher Education

JF - Teaching in Higher Education

SN - 1356-2517

IS - 4

ER -