Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol

Lee Taylor, Natalie Fitch, Paul Castle, Samuel Watkins, Jeffrey Aldous, Nicholas Sculthorpe, Adrian Midgely, John Brewer, Alexis Mauger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow 5 degrees C, Madrid 30 degrees C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; 5 degrees C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30 C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT, 18 C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p= 0.31; HIT p= 0.15; MISSED p= 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.
Original languageEnglish
Article number185
JournalFrontiers in Physiology
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 May 2014

Keywords

  • soccer referee
  • thermoregulation
  • cognition
  • hot
  • cold

Cite this

Taylor, Lee ; Fitch, Natalie ; Castle, Paul ; Watkins, Samuel ; Aldous, Jeffrey ; Sculthorpe, Nicholas ; Midgely, Adrian ; Brewer, John ; Mauger, Alexis. / Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol. In: Frontiers in Physiology. 2014 ; Vol. 5.
@article{a807aeeeae8b47d6af7cfc57e8877cd0,
title = "Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol",
abstract = "Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow 5 degrees C, Madrid 30 degrees C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; 5 degrees C, 40{\%} relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30 C, 40{\%} RH) and temperate (CONT, 18 C, 40{\%} RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p= 0.31; HIT p= 0.15; MISSED p= 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95{\%} CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95{\%} CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95{\%} CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.",
keywords = "soccer referee, thermoregulation, cognition, hot, cold",
author = "Lee Taylor and Natalie Fitch and Paul Castle and Samuel Watkins and Jeffrey Aldous and Nicholas Sculthorpe and Adrian Midgely and John Brewer and Alexis Mauger",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3389/fphys.2014.00185",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Physiology",
issn = "1664-042X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media",

}

Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol. / Taylor, Lee; Fitch, Natalie; Castle, Paul; Watkins, Samuel; Aldous, Jeffrey; Sculthorpe, Nicholas; Midgely, Adrian; Brewer, John; Mauger, Alexis.

In: Frontiers in Physiology, Vol. 5, 185, 20.05.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol

AU - Taylor, Lee

AU - Fitch, Natalie

AU - Castle, Paul

AU - Watkins, Samuel

AU - Aldous, Jeffrey

AU - Sculthorpe, Nicholas

AU - Midgely, Adrian

AU - Brewer, John

AU - Mauger, Alexis

PY - 2014/5/20

Y1 - 2014/5/20

N2 - Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow 5 degrees C, Madrid 30 degrees C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; 5 degrees C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30 C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT, 18 C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p= 0.31; HIT p= 0.15; MISSED p= 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.

AB - Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow 5 degrees C, Madrid 30 degrees C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; 5 degrees C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30 C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT, 18 C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p= 0.31; HIT p= 0.15; MISSED p= 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.

KW - soccer referee

KW - thermoregulation

KW - cognition

KW - hot

KW - cold

U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2014.00185

DO - 10.3389/fphys.2014.00185

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Physiology

JF - Frontiers in Physiology

SN - 1664-042X

M1 - 185

ER -