Exploring the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

Iain McPhee, Colin R. Martin, Anthony Sneider

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose
    – This paper aims to critically explore the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act (1971). Scotland prosecutes 24 per cent of people found in possession of illegal drugs for drug “dealing” compared to less than 15 per cent in England and Wales and less than 16 per cent in Northern Ireland.

    Design/methodology/approach
    – The paper provides a narrative review in the context of the background of the economic and social costs of illegal drugs in Scotland and compares this with the UK and Northern Ireland.

    Findings
    – The explanation for such a wide disparity in numbers of dealers between these countries proposed is that the Scottish Police force is comparatively more successful at persuading courts that small quantities of drugs rather than for personal use are in fact for onward sale or supply to others.

    Practical implications
    – The police in Scotland have a network of specialist drug units in which officers make decisions in the absence of benchmarks against which to judge quantities of repossessed drugs. Taking this approach, a devolved Scotland's commitment to drug prohibition has resulted in some very curious differences in classifications of prosecutions compared to other countries.

    Originality/value
    – The paper explores the consequences of how Scotland deals with the use of illegal drugs and the economic and social costs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)146-156
    Number of pages11
    JournalDrugs and Alcohol Today
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • dealing
    • drugs
    • policy
    • prosecution
    • Scotland
    • trafficking
    • drug controls
    • laws and legislation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this