Exploring the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

Iain McPhee, Colin R. Martin, Anthony Sneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
– This paper aims to critically explore the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act (1971). Scotland prosecutes 24 per cent of people found in possession of illegal drugs for drug “dealing” compared to less than 15 per cent in England and Wales and less than 16 per cent in Northern Ireland.

Design/methodology/approach
– The paper provides a narrative review in the context of the background of the economic and social costs of illegal drugs in Scotland and compares this with the UK and Northern Ireland.

Findings
– The explanation for such a wide disparity in numbers of dealers between these countries proposed is that the Scottish Police force is comparatively more successful at persuading courts that small quantities of drugs rather than for personal use are in fact for onward sale or supply to others.

Practical implications
– The police in Scotland have a network of specialist drug units in which officers make decisions in the absence of benchmarks against which to judge quantities of repossessed drugs. Taking this approach, a devolved Scotland's commitment to drug prohibition has resulted in some very curious differences in classifications of prosecutions compared to other countries.

Originality/value
– The paper explores the consequences of how Scotland deals with the use of illegal drugs and the economic and social costs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-156
Number of pages11
JournalDrugs and Alcohol Today
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Scotland
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Northern Ireland
Police
Drug Trafficking
Economics
Benchmarking
Drug Costs
Wales
England
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • dealing
  • drugs
  • policy
  • prosecution
  • Scotland
  • trafficking
  • drug controls
  • laws and legislation

Cite this

@article{ec1f07a53aaa45a7bb140546a3c3f5f7,
title = "Exploring the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971",
abstract = "Purpose– This paper aims to critically explore the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act (1971). Scotland prosecutes 24 per cent of people found in possession of illegal drugs for drug “dealing” compared to less than 15 per cent in England and Wales and less than 16 per cent in Northern Ireland.Design/methodology/approach– The paper provides a narrative review in the context of the background of the economic and social costs of illegal drugs in Scotland and compares this with the UK and Northern Ireland.Findings– The explanation for such a wide disparity in numbers of dealers between these countries proposed is that the Scottish Police force is comparatively more successful at persuading courts that small quantities of drugs rather than for personal use are in fact for onward sale or supply to others.Practical implications– The police in Scotland have a network of specialist drug units in which officers make decisions in the absence of benchmarks against which to judge quantities of repossessed drugs. Taking this approach, a devolved Scotland's commitment to drug prohibition has resulted in some very curious differences in classifications of prosecutions compared to other countries.Originality/value– The paper explores the consequences of how Scotland deals with the use of illegal drugs and the economic and social costs.",
keywords = "dealing, drugs, policy, prosecution, Scotland, trafficking, drug controls, laws and legislation",
author = "Iain McPhee and Martin, {Colin R.} and Anthony Sneider",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/17459261211263433",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "146--156",
journal = "Drugs and Alcohol Today",
issn = "1745-9265",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "3",

}

Exploring the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. / McPhee, Iain; Martin, Colin R.; Sneider, Anthony.

In: Drugs and Alcohol Today, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2012, p. 146-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

AU - McPhee, Iain

AU - Martin, Colin R.

AU - Sneider, Anthony

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose– This paper aims to critically explore the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act (1971). Scotland prosecutes 24 per cent of people found in possession of illegal drugs for drug “dealing” compared to less than 15 per cent in England and Wales and less than 16 per cent in Northern Ireland.Design/methodology/approach– The paper provides a narrative review in the context of the background of the economic and social costs of illegal drugs in Scotland and compares this with the UK and Northern Ireland.Findings– The explanation for such a wide disparity in numbers of dealers between these countries proposed is that the Scottish Police force is comparatively more successful at persuading courts that small quantities of drugs rather than for personal use are in fact for onward sale or supply to others.Practical implications– The police in Scotland have a network of specialist drug units in which officers make decisions in the absence of benchmarks against which to judge quantities of repossessed drugs. Taking this approach, a devolved Scotland's commitment to drug prohibition has resulted in some very curious differences in classifications of prosecutions compared to other countries.Originality/value– The paper explores the consequences of how Scotland deals with the use of illegal drugs and the economic and social costs.

AB - Purpose– This paper aims to critically explore the consequences of how Scotland interprets the UK Misuse of Drugs Act (1971). Scotland prosecutes 24 per cent of people found in possession of illegal drugs for drug “dealing” compared to less than 15 per cent in England and Wales and less than 16 per cent in Northern Ireland.Design/methodology/approach– The paper provides a narrative review in the context of the background of the economic and social costs of illegal drugs in Scotland and compares this with the UK and Northern Ireland.Findings– The explanation for such a wide disparity in numbers of dealers between these countries proposed is that the Scottish Police force is comparatively more successful at persuading courts that small quantities of drugs rather than for personal use are in fact for onward sale or supply to others.Practical implications– The police in Scotland have a network of specialist drug units in which officers make decisions in the absence of benchmarks against which to judge quantities of repossessed drugs. Taking this approach, a devolved Scotland's commitment to drug prohibition has resulted in some very curious differences in classifications of prosecutions compared to other countries.Originality/value– The paper explores the consequences of how Scotland deals with the use of illegal drugs and the economic and social costs.

KW - dealing

KW - drugs

KW - policy

KW - prosecution

KW - Scotland

KW - trafficking

KW - drug controls

KW - laws and legislation

U2 - 10.1108/17459261211263433

DO - 10.1108/17459261211263433

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 146

EP - 156

JO - Drugs and Alcohol Today

JF - Drugs and Alcohol Today

SN - 1745-9265

IS - 3

ER -