Experimental axial-compressive behaviour of bare cold-formed-steel studs with semirigid-track and ideal-hinged boundary-conditions

Sohini Mishra, Ciaran McNally, Andrzej M. Wrzesien, Daniel P. Mccrum

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Studs are the primary load-bearing components in cold-formed steel (CFS) wall panels, connected to tracks at both ends with self-tapping screws, forming a semirigid boundary condition (BCT). Most existing tests on the axial compressive behaviour of bare CFS studs are based on either theoretically-hinged (BCH) or fully-fixed boundary conditions. Previous researchers have employed BCT only on sheathed stud-wall panels. However, practicing engineers and current design codes, e.g., Eurocode 3, follow an all-steel design. Therefore, this research experimentally investigated bare-CFS-studs' axial compressive behaviour with BCT, considering, for the first time, the combined effect of the tracks' warping rigidity, stud-to-track gap, non-linear connection stiffness, and bare studs' various cross-sectional slenderness. Forty-two industry-standard lipped channel sections (studs) of five thicknesses (1.2-3 mm), three depths (75–125 mm), and two heights (1.2 & 1.5 m) were tested under static-concentric axial compressive loading with BCT. Another fourteen studs were tested with BCH, a comparator to BCT. Results demonstrated that the studs' global failure mechanisms were flexural-torsional in BCT instead of flexural in BCH. Studs' axial stiffness was two-phased in BCT due to the stud-to-track gap, compared to single-phased stiffness in BCH. >1.8 mm stud-to-track gap caused stud-to-track connections' failure and studs' sudden capacity reduction during gap closure. Studs achieved 1.22 times higher axial-compressive strength, 2.3 times more axial-shortening, 0.7 times lower axial stiffness, and 58% lower axial-compressive strain at the web-midheight under BCT-PhaseII than BCH. Tested strengths were compared with EC3 design strength, and an effective-length-factor of 0.65 was suggested for efficient design of studs with BCT.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number108600
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Constructional Steel Research
    Volume216
    Early online date11 Mar 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2024

    Keywords

    • bare stud
    • track boundaray condition
    • hinged boundary condition
    • warping rigidity
    • axial compressive strength
    • axial stiffness

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental axial-compressive behaviour of bare cold-formed-steel studs with semirigid-track and ideal-hinged boundary-conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this