Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision

Graham G. Scott, Patrick J. O'Donnell, Sara C. Sereno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined the categorical nature of emotion word recognition. Positive, negative, and neutral words were presented in lexical decision tasks. Word frequency was additionally manipulated. In Experiment 1, "positive" and "negative" categories of words were implicitly indicated by the blocked design employed. A significant emotion-frequency interaction was obtained, replicating past research. While positive words consistently elicited faster responses than neutral words, only low frequency negative words demonstrated a similar advantage. In Experiments 2a and 2b, explicit categories ("positive," "negative," and "household" items) were specified to participants. Positive words again elicited faster responses than did neutral words. Responses to negative words, however, were no different than those to neutral words, regardless of their frequency. The overall pattern of effects indicates that positive words are always facilitated, frequency plays a greater role in the recognition of negative words, and a "negative" category represents a somewhat disparate set of emotions. These results support the notion that emotion word processing may be moderated by distinct systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-215
JournalCognitive Processing
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Emotion
  • Word frequency
  • Category
  • Lexical decision
  • Arousal
  • Valence

Cite this

Scott, Graham G. ; O'Donnell, Patrick J. ; Sereno, Sara C. / Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision. In: Cognitive Processing. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 209-215.
@article{b2c45424fa464fd98129d57e176683fe,
title = "Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision",
abstract = "We examined the categorical nature of emotion word recognition. Positive, negative, and neutral words were presented in lexical decision tasks. Word frequency was additionally manipulated. In Experiment 1, {"}positive{"} and {"}negative{"} categories of words were implicitly indicated by the blocked design employed. A significant emotion-frequency interaction was obtained, replicating past research. While positive words consistently elicited faster responses than neutral words, only low frequency negative words demonstrated a similar advantage. In Experiments 2a and 2b, explicit categories ({"}positive,{"} {"}negative,{"} and {"}household{"} items) were specified to participants. Positive words again elicited faster responses than did neutral words. Responses to negative words, however, were no different than those to neutral words, regardless of their frequency. The overall pattern of effects indicates that positive words are always facilitated, frequency plays a greater role in the recognition of negative words, and a {"}negative{"} category represents a somewhat disparate set of emotions. These results support the notion that emotion word processing may be moderated by distinct systems.",
keywords = "Emotion, Word frequency, Category, Lexical decision, Arousal, Valence",
author = "Scott, {Graham G.} and O'Donnell, {Patrick J.} and Sereno, {Sara C.}",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s10339-013-0589-6",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "209--215",
journal = "Cognitive Processing",
issn = "1612-4782",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "2",

}

Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision. / Scott, Graham G.; O'Donnell, Patrick J.; Sereno, Sara C.

In: Cognitive Processing, Vol. 15, No. 2, 05.2014, p. 209-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision

AU - Scott, Graham G.

AU - O'Donnell, Patrick J.

AU - Sereno, Sara C.

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - We examined the categorical nature of emotion word recognition. Positive, negative, and neutral words were presented in lexical decision tasks. Word frequency was additionally manipulated. In Experiment 1, "positive" and "negative" categories of words were implicitly indicated by the blocked design employed. A significant emotion-frequency interaction was obtained, replicating past research. While positive words consistently elicited faster responses than neutral words, only low frequency negative words demonstrated a similar advantage. In Experiments 2a and 2b, explicit categories ("positive," "negative," and "household" items) were specified to participants. Positive words again elicited faster responses than did neutral words. Responses to negative words, however, were no different than those to neutral words, regardless of their frequency. The overall pattern of effects indicates that positive words are always facilitated, frequency plays a greater role in the recognition of negative words, and a "negative" category represents a somewhat disparate set of emotions. These results support the notion that emotion word processing may be moderated by distinct systems.

AB - We examined the categorical nature of emotion word recognition. Positive, negative, and neutral words were presented in lexical decision tasks. Word frequency was additionally manipulated. In Experiment 1, "positive" and "negative" categories of words were implicitly indicated by the blocked design employed. A significant emotion-frequency interaction was obtained, replicating past research. While positive words consistently elicited faster responses than neutral words, only low frequency negative words demonstrated a similar advantage. In Experiments 2a and 2b, explicit categories ("positive," "negative," and "household" items) were specified to participants. Positive words again elicited faster responses than did neutral words. Responses to negative words, however, were no different than those to neutral words, regardless of their frequency. The overall pattern of effects indicates that positive words are always facilitated, frequency plays a greater role in the recognition of negative words, and a "negative" category represents a somewhat disparate set of emotions. These results support the notion that emotion word processing may be moderated by distinct systems.

KW - Emotion

KW - Word frequency

KW - Category

KW - Lexical decision

KW - Arousal

KW - Valence

U2 - 10.1007/s10339-013-0589-6

DO - 10.1007/s10339-013-0589-6

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 209

EP - 215

JO - Cognitive Processing

JF - Cognitive Processing

SN - 1612-4782

IS - 2

ER -