Electromyographic analyses of the erector spinae muscles during golf swings using four different clubs

Graeme G. Sorbie, Fergal M. Grace, Yaodong Gu, Julien S. Baker, Ukadike C. Ugbolue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
162 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the electromyography (EMG) patterns of the thoracic and lumbar regions of the erector spinae (ES) muscle during the golf swing whilst using four different golf clubs. Fifteen right-handed male golfers performed a total of twenty swings in random order using the driver, 4-iron, 7-iron and pitching-wedge. Surface EMG was recorded from the lead and trail sides of the thoracic and lumbar regions of the ES muscle (T8, L1 and L5 lateral to the spinous-process). Three-dimensional high-speed video analysis was used to identify the backswing, forward swing, acceleration, early and late follow-through phases of the golf swing. No significant differences in muscle-activation levels from the lead and trail sides of the thoracic and lumbar regions of the ES muscle were displayed between the driver, 4-iron, 7-iron and pitching-wedge (P > 0.05). The highest mean thoracic and lumbar ES muscle-activation levels were displayed in the forward swing (67–99% MVC) and acceleration (83–106% MVC) phases of the swing for all clubs tested. The findings from this study show that there were no significant statistical differences between the driver, 4-iron, 7-iron and pitching-wedge when examining muscle activity from the thoracic and lumbar regions of the ES muscle.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)717-723
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume36
Issue number7
Early online date8 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • EMG
  • MVC
  • thoracic
  • lumbar
  • club head speed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electromyographic analyses of the erector spinae muscles during golf swings using four different clubs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this