Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text messages with or without endowment incentives for weight management in men with obesity (Game of Stones): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  • Lisa Macaulay*
  • , Catriona O’Dolan
  • , Alison Avenell
  • , Paula Carroll
  • , Seonaidh Cotton
  • , Stephan Dombrowski
  • , Andrew Elders
  • , Beatriz Goulao
  • , Cindy Gray
  • , Fiona M. Harris
  • , Kate Hunt
  • , Frank Kee
  • , Graeme MacLennan
  • , Matthew David McDonald
  • , Michelle McKinley
  • , Rebecca Skinner
  • , Claire Torrens
  • , Martin Tod
  • , Katrina Turner
  • , Marjon van der Pol
  • Pat Hoddinott
*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background 

    Obesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, mobility problems and some cancers, and its prevalence is rising. Men engage less than women in existing weight loss interventions. Game of Stones builds on a successful feasibility study and aims to find out if automated text messages with or without endowment incentives are effective and cost-effective for weight loss at 12 months compared to a waiting list comparator arm in men with obesity.

    Methods 

    A 3-arm, parallel group, assessor-blind superiority randomised controlled trial with process evaluation will recruit 585 adult men with body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or more living in and around three UK centres (Belfast, Bristol, Glasgow), purposively targeting disadvantaged areas. Intervention groups: (i) automated, theory-informed text messages daily for 12 months plus endowment incentives linked to verified weight loss targets at 3, 6 and 12 months; (ii) the same text messages and weight loss assessment protocol; (iii) comparator group: 12 month waiting list, then text messages for 3 months. The primary outcome is percentage weight change at 12 months from baseline. Secondary outcomes at 12 months are as follows: quality of life, wellbeing, mental health, weight stigma, behaviours, satisfaction and confidence. Follow-up includes weight at 24 months. A health economic evaluation will measure cost-effectiveness over the trial and over modelled lifetime: including health service resource-use and quality-adjusted life years. The cost-utility analysis will report incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained. Participant and service provider perspectives will be explored via telephone interviews, and exploratory mixed methods process evaluation analyses will focus on mental health, multiple long-term conditions, health inequalities and implementation strategies.

    Discussion 

    The trial will report whether text messages (with and without cash incentives) can help men to lose weight over 1 year and maintain this for another year compared to a comparator group; the costs and benefits to the health service; and men’s experiences of the interventions. Process analyses with public involvement and service commissioner input will ensure that this open-source digital self-care intervention could be sustainable and scalable by a range of NHS or public services.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number582
    Number of pages19
    JournalTrials
    Volume23
    Issue number1
    Early online date22 Jul 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2022

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • cost-effectiveness
    • financial incentives
    • health inequalities
    • men with obesity
    • process evaluation
    • randomised controlled trial
    • text messages
    • weight management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text messages with or without endowment incentives for weight management in men with obesity (Game of Stones): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this