Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words

Bo Yao, Anne Keitel, Gillian Bruce, Graham G Scott, Patrick O'Donnell, Sara Sereno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Emotion (positive and negative) words are typically recognized faster than neutral words. Recent research suggests that emotional valence, while often treated as a unitary semantic property, may be differentially represented in concrete and abstract words. Studies that have explicitly examined the interaction of emotion and concreteness, however, have demonstrated inconsistent patterns of results. Moreover, these findings may be limited as certain key lexical variables (e.g., familiarity, age of acquisition) were not taken into account. We investigated the emotion-concreteness interaction in a large-scale, highly-controlled lexical decision experiment. A 3 (Emotion: negative, neutral, positive) × 2 (Concreteness: abstract, concrete) design was used, with 45 items per condition and 127 participants. We found a significant interaction between emotion and concreteness. Although positive and negative valenced words were recognized faster than neutral words, this emotion advantage was significantly larger in concrete than in abstract words. We explored potential contributions of participant alexithymia level and item imageability to this interactive pattern. We found that only word imageability significantly modulated the emotion-concreteness interaction. While both concrete and abstract emotion words are advantageously processed relative to comparable neutral words, the mechanisms of this facilitation are paradoxically more dependent on imageability in abstract words.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1064-1074
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Emotions
emotion
interaction
Affective Symptoms
Emotion
Concreteness
Semantics
semantics
experiment
Research
Interaction
Imageability

Cite this

@article{9ae45254a90d4799ac42861cfa213ebf,
title = "Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words",
abstract = "Emotion (positive and negative) words are typically recognized faster than neutral words. Recent research suggests that emotional valence, while often treated as a unitary semantic property, may be differentially represented in concrete and abstract words. Studies that have explicitly examined the interaction of emotion and concreteness, however, have demonstrated inconsistent patterns of results. Moreover, these findings may be limited as certain key lexical variables (e.g., familiarity, age of acquisition) were not taken into account. We investigated the emotion-concreteness interaction in a large-scale, highly-controlled lexical decision experiment. A 3 (Emotion: negative, neutral, positive) × 2 (Concreteness: abstract, concrete) design was used, with 45 items per condition and 127 participants. We found a significant interaction between emotion and concreteness. Although positive and negative valenced words were recognized faster than neutral words, this emotion advantage was significantly larger in concrete than in abstract words. We explored potential contributions of participant alexithymia level and item imageability to this interactive pattern. We found that only word imageability significantly modulated the emotion-concreteness interaction. While both concrete and abstract emotion words are advantageously processed relative to comparable neutral words, the mechanisms of this facilitation are paradoxically more dependent on imageability in abstract words.",
author = "Bo Yao and Anne Keitel and Gillian Bruce and Scott, {Graham G} and Patrick O'Donnell and Sara Sereno",
note = "This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000464",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1064--1074",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "7",

}

Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words. / Yao, Bo ; Keitel, Anne; Bruce, Gillian; Scott, Graham G; O'Donnell, Patrick; Sereno, Sara.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 44, No. 7, 12.02.2018, p. 1064-1074.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words

AU - Yao, Bo

AU - Keitel, Anne

AU - Bruce, Gillian

AU - Scott, Graham G

AU - O'Donnell, Patrick

AU - Sereno, Sara

N1 - This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.

PY - 2018/2/12

Y1 - 2018/2/12

N2 - Emotion (positive and negative) words are typically recognized faster than neutral words. Recent research suggests that emotional valence, while often treated as a unitary semantic property, may be differentially represented in concrete and abstract words. Studies that have explicitly examined the interaction of emotion and concreteness, however, have demonstrated inconsistent patterns of results. Moreover, these findings may be limited as certain key lexical variables (e.g., familiarity, age of acquisition) were not taken into account. We investigated the emotion-concreteness interaction in a large-scale, highly-controlled lexical decision experiment. A 3 (Emotion: negative, neutral, positive) × 2 (Concreteness: abstract, concrete) design was used, with 45 items per condition and 127 participants. We found a significant interaction between emotion and concreteness. Although positive and negative valenced words were recognized faster than neutral words, this emotion advantage was significantly larger in concrete than in abstract words. We explored potential contributions of participant alexithymia level and item imageability to this interactive pattern. We found that only word imageability significantly modulated the emotion-concreteness interaction. While both concrete and abstract emotion words are advantageously processed relative to comparable neutral words, the mechanisms of this facilitation are paradoxically more dependent on imageability in abstract words.

AB - Emotion (positive and negative) words are typically recognized faster than neutral words. Recent research suggests that emotional valence, while often treated as a unitary semantic property, may be differentially represented in concrete and abstract words. Studies that have explicitly examined the interaction of emotion and concreteness, however, have demonstrated inconsistent patterns of results. Moreover, these findings may be limited as certain key lexical variables (e.g., familiarity, age of acquisition) were not taken into account. We investigated the emotion-concreteness interaction in a large-scale, highly-controlled lexical decision experiment. A 3 (Emotion: negative, neutral, positive) × 2 (Concreteness: abstract, concrete) design was used, with 45 items per condition and 127 participants. We found a significant interaction between emotion and concreteness. Although positive and negative valenced words were recognized faster than neutral words, this emotion advantage was significantly larger in concrete than in abstract words. We explored potential contributions of participant alexithymia level and item imageability to this interactive pattern. We found that only word imageability significantly modulated the emotion-concreteness interaction. While both concrete and abstract emotion words are advantageously processed relative to comparable neutral words, the mechanisms of this facilitation are paradoxically more dependent on imageability in abstract words.

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000464

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000464

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1064

EP - 1074

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 7

ER -