Abstract
Transcription is an integral part of much qualitative data analysis, yet rarely has it received close attention in debates over the use (or non-use) of computer assisted qualitative data analysis soft-ware (CAQDAS). This article draws upon a mixed-methods study that involved transcribing conversational interviews with carers, third sector practitioners and policy-makers, to explore how computer assisted transcription software (CATS) can affect data and its analysis in ways unanticipated at the outset by researchers. From an agential realist perspective, the article out-lines three steps towards making principled choices over the use (or non-use) of CAQDAS in qualitative data analysis. These steps require navigating extremes associated with technological determinism; that we re-think our understandings of the software-data-researcher relationship; and that we move away from asking how well a given CAQDAS can 'perform' and towards ex-ploring what a given CAQDAS can (and cannot) do
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 97-109 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International Journal of Social Research Methodology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 10 Aug 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2023 |
Keywords
- CAQDAS
- computer assisted transcription software
- agential realism
- entanglement
- qualitative data analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Did they really say that? An agential realist approach to using computer assisted transcription software in qualitative data analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver