Abstract
Transcription is an integral part of much qualitative data analysis, yet rarely has it received close attention in debates over the use (or non-use) of computer assisted qualitative data analysis soft-ware (CAQDAS). This article draws upon a mixed-methods study that involved transcribing conversational interviews with carers, third sector practitioners and policy-makers, to explore how computer assisted transcription software (CATS) can affect data and its analysis in ways unanticipated at the outset by researchers. From an agential realist perspective, the article out-lines three steps towards making principled choices over the use (or non-use) of CAQDAS in qualitative data analysis. These steps require navigating extremes associated with technological determinism; that we re-think our understandings of the software-data-researcher relationship; and that we move away from asking how well a given CAQDAS can 'perform' and towards ex-ploring what a given CAQDAS can (and cannot) do
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 97-109 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | International Journal of Social Research Methodology |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 10 Aug 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2023 |
Keywords
- CAQDAS
- computer assisted transcription software
- agential realism
- entanglement
- qualitative data analysis