Dialectical collaborative theatre

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Dialectical Collaborative Theatre (DCT)
Theme:
Identity-Diversity
Economy-Culture
Abstract:
In order to challenge assumptions of cultural ownership, I founded BloodWater Theatre (BTW) to examine the local/international dimension of theatre and the individual/collective leadership of artistic processes. Collaboration is the buzz word used in promoting interdisciplinary arts projects, international partnerships and ways of working to develop artistic practice. Yet the word itself suggests anything from collaborating with the enemy to collaborations promoting egalitarian work practices demonstrating the indivisibility of politics and collaboration. BTW discovers dialectical collaborative theatre (DCT) as a means to politicise processes of collaboration. This account is intended to provoke discussion on the ethics of representation; the value of the labour of the artist in the rehearsal room and whether there is a need to find prefixes to qualify the nature of collaboration.
BWT productions to date experiment with multiple identities of self, and staged self via character, with the audience experiencing both, in the course of the performance. We bring in characters from different parts of the world into the rehearsal room although our residential identities are localised to the UK. The motivation for this is to share multiple stories born out of different cultural and ethnic origins in one setting so that stories that are not often heard in this setting can be heard. The different ethnic identities are staged with an acknowledgement to the audience that the identities are staged but with a commitment to stage these identities with empathy and respect for the other. Like Latrell (2008) who reviews the artistic practices of the Sarawak Cultural Village, BWT sees cultural ownership as “contextual and multiple”.
BWT comprises of two women - five men - two East Indians (British and Singaporean) – four White Scottish – one White Polish. In developing the work, we develop Bial’s theory of double coding where “what works for one audience on a universal level works for another audience specifically”. The characters BTW develop originate from Belfast, Sydney, Cairo, Torun and Singapore and not their own place of birth but a connection to the chosen place, prompts an investment in them. In doing so, BWT creates a forum for multiple ethnicities and cultural identities to be performed on one stage at one time allowing for varied experiences of the audience in the context of the specific, the other and the universal.
BWT members have to date created this work in their own time whilst earning a living out with. It operates without a designated director or writer.
http://www.bloodwatertheatre.co.uk/
http://www.cca-glasgow.com/programme/52825929a1e3d3ac6700002e

Key words or phrases:
Dialectical collaborative theatre
Multiple identities
Cultural ownership
3 Questions:
What are the ethical considerations when choosing to perform fictionalised autobiographies on stage?
Is it possible to collaborate without hierarchy?
Does the economy determine the value of the artist in the rehearsal room?
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-2
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Event13th ELIA Biennial Conference - Glasgow, United Kingdom
Duration: 13 Nov 201415 Nov 2014

Conference

Conference13th ELIA Biennial Conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityGlasgow
Period13/11/1415/11/14

Fingerprint

theater
artist
ethnic origin
ethnic identity
cultural identity
empathy
Singapore
director
Values
coding
respect
ethnicity
village
writer
moral philosophy
commitment
art
leadership
labor
economy

Cite this

Ronan, J. (2014). Dialectical collaborative theatre. 1-2. Paper presented at 13th ELIA Biennial Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ronan, Joanna. / Dialectical collaborative theatre. Paper presented at 13th ELIA Biennial Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.2 p.
@conference{758acfff52114bfd8a6b7682f152103e,
title = "Dialectical collaborative theatre",
abstract = "Dialectical Collaborative Theatre (DCT)Theme:Identity-DiversityEconomy-CultureAbstract:In order to challenge assumptions of cultural ownership, I founded BloodWater Theatre (BTW) to examine the local/international dimension of theatre and the individual/collective leadership of artistic processes. Collaboration is the buzz word used in promoting interdisciplinary arts projects, international partnerships and ways of working to develop artistic practice. Yet the word itself suggests anything from collaborating with the enemy to collaborations promoting egalitarian work practices demonstrating the indivisibility of politics and collaboration. BTW discovers dialectical collaborative theatre (DCT) as a means to politicise processes of collaboration. This account is intended to provoke discussion on the ethics of representation; the value of the labour of the artist in the rehearsal room and whether there is a need to find prefixes to qualify the nature of collaboration. BWT productions to date experiment with multiple identities of self, and staged self via character, with the audience experiencing both, in the course of the performance. We bring in characters from different parts of the world into the rehearsal room although our residential identities are localised to the UK. The motivation for this is to share multiple stories born out of different cultural and ethnic origins in one setting so that stories that are not often heard in this setting can be heard. The different ethnic identities are staged with an acknowledgement to the audience that the identities are staged but with a commitment to stage these identities with empathy and respect for the other. Like Latrell (2008) who reviews the artistic practices of the Sarawak Cultural Village, BWT sees cultural ownership as “contextual and multiple”. BWT comprises of two women - five men - two East Indians (British and Singaporean) – four White Scottish – one White Polish. In developing the work, we develop Bial’s theory of double coding where “what works for one audience on a universal level works for another audience specifically”. The characters BTW develop originate from Belfast, Sydney, Cairo, Torun and Singapore and not their own place of birth but a connection to the chosen place, prompts an investment in them. In doing so, BWT creates a forum for multiple ethnicities and cultural identities to be performed on one stage at one time allowing for varied experiences of the audience in the context of the specific, the other and the universal. BWT members have to date created this work in their own time whilst earning a living out with. It operates without a designated director or writer.http://www.bloodwatertheatre.co.uk/ http://www.cca-glasgow.com/programme/52825929a1e3d3ac6700002eKey words or phrases:Dialectical collaborative theatreMultiple identitiesCultural ownership3 Questions:What are the ethical considerations when choosing to perform fictionalised autobiographies on stage?Is it possible to collaborate without hierarchy?Does the economy determine the value of the artist in the rehearsal room?",
author = "Joanna Ronan",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
pages = "1--2",
note = "13th ELIA Biennial Conference ; Conference date: 13-11-2014 Through 15-11-2014",

}

Ronan, J 2014, 'Dialectical collaborative theatre' Paper presented at 13th ELIA Biennial Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 13/11/14 - 15/11/14, pp. 1-2.

Dialectical collaborative theatre. / Ronan, Joanna.

2014. 1-2 Paper presented at 13th ELIA Biennial Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Dialectical collaborative theatre

AU - Ronan, Joanna

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Dialectical Collaborative Theatre (DCT)Theme:Identity-DiversityEconomy-CultureAbstract:In order to challenge assumptions of cultural ownership, I founded BloodWater Theatre (BTW) to examine the local/international dimension of theatre and the individual/collective leadership of artistic processes. Collaboration is the buzz word used in promoting interdisciplinary arts projects, international partnerships and ways of working to develop artistic practice. Yet the word itself suggests anything from collaborating with the enemy to collaborations promoting egalitarian work practices demonstrating the indivisibility of politics and collaboration. BTW discovers dialectical collaborative theatre (DCT) as a means to politicise processes of collaboration. This account is intended to provoke discussion on the ethics of representation; the value of the labour of the artist in the rehearsal room and whether there is a need to find prefixes to qualify the nature of collaboration. BWT productions to date experiment with multiple identities of self, and staged self via character, with the audience experiencing both, in the course of the performance. We bring in characters from different parts of the world into the rehearsal room although our residential identities are localised to the UK. The motivation for this is to share multiple stories born out of different cultural and ethnic origins in one setting so that stories that are not often heard in this setting can be heard. The different ethnic identities are staged with an acknowledgement to the audience that the identities are staged but with a commitment to stage these identities with empathy and respect for the other. Like Latrell (2008) who reviews the artistic practices of the Sarawak Cultural Village, BWT sees cultural ownership as “contextual and multiple”. BWT comprises of two women - five men - two East Indians (British and Singaporean) – four White Scottish – one White Polish. In developing the work, we develop Bial’s theory of double coding where “what works for one audience on a universal level works for another audience specifically”. The characters BTW develop originate from Belfast, Sydney, Cairo, Torun and Singapore and not their own place of birth but a connection to the chosen place, prompts an investment in them. In doing so, BWT creates a forum for multiple ethnicities and cultural identities to be performed on one stage at one time allowing for varied experiences of the audience in the context of the specific, the other and the universal. BWT members have to date created this work in their own time whilst earning a living out with. It operates without a designated director or writer.http://www.bloodwatertheatre.co.uk/ http://www.cca-glasgow.com/programme/52825929a1e3d3ac6700002eKey words or phrases:Dialectical collaborative theatreMultiple identitiesCultural ownership3 Questions:What are the ethical considerations when choosing to perform fictionalised autobiographies on stage?Is it possible to collaborate without hierarchy?Does the economy determine the value of the artist in the rehearsal room?

AB - Dialectical Collaborative Theatre (DCT)Theme:Identity-DiversityEconomy-CultureAbstract:In order to challenge assumptions of cultural ownership, I founded BloodWater Theatre (BTW) to examine the local/international dimension of theatre and the individual/collective leadership of artistic processes. Collaboration is the buzz word used in promoting interdisciplinary arts projects, international partnerships and ways of working to develop artistic practice. Yet the word itself suggests anything from collaborating with the enemy to collaborations promoting egalitarian work practices demonstrating the indivisibility of politics and collaboration. BTW discovers dialectical collaborative theatre (DCT) as a means to politicise processes of collaboration. This account is intended to provoke discussion on the ethics of representation; the value of the labour of the artist in the rehearsal room and whether there is a need to find prefixes to qualify the nature of collaboration. BWT productions to date experiment with multiple identities of self, and staged self via character, with the audience experiencing both, in the course of the performance. We bring in characters from different parts of the world into the rehearsal room although our residential identities are localised to the UK. The motivation for this is to share multiple stories born out of different cultural and ethnic origins in one setting so that stories that are not often heard in this setting can be heard. The different ethnic identities are staged with an acknowledgement to the audience that the identities are staged but with a commitment to stage these identities with empathy and respect for the other. Like Latrell (2008) who reviews the artistic practices of the Sarawak Cultural Village, BWT sees cultural ownership as “contextual and multiple”. BWT comprises of two women - five men - two East Indians (British and Singaporean) – four White Scottish – one White Polish. In developing the work, we develop Bial’s theory of double coding where “what works for one audience on a universal level works for another audience specifically”. The characters BTW develop originate from Belfast, Sydney, Cairo, Torun and Singapore and not their own place of birth but a connection to the chosen place, prompts an investment in them. In doing so, BWT creates a forum for multiple ethnicities and cultural identities to be performed on one stage at one time allowing for varied experiences of the audience in the context of the specific, the other and the universal. BWT members have to date created this work in their own time whilst earning a living out with. It operates without a designated director or writer.http://www.bloodwatertheatre.co.uk/ http://www.cca-glasgow.com/programme/52825929a1e3d3ac6700002eKey words or phrases:Dialectical collaborative theatreMultiple identitiesCultural ownership3 Questions:What are the ethical considerations when choosing to perform fictionalised autobiographies on stage?Is it possible to collaborate without hierarchy?Does the economy determine the value of the artist in the rehearsal room?

UR - http://www.elia-artschools.org/images/activiteiten/51/files/elialabrochure2014.pdf

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 2

ER -

Ronan J. Dialectical collaborative theatre. 2014. Paper presented at 13th ELIA Biennial Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.