Developing inter-disciplinary and inter-agency networks: reflections on a “community of practice” approach

Sarah E. Anderson, Catherine Hennessy, Michelle Cornes, Jill Manthorpe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose
People with a dual diagnosis or other multiple and complex needs often require support from a range of services and agencies. Social policy has focused on achieving an integrated response from practitioners; however, service responses to this group frequently remain fragmented. Practitioners supporting these clients are likely to need knowledge drawn from multiple disciplines and awareness of complex and changing services. Research suggests the value of professional networks for knowledge transfer. The purpose of this paper is to describe one's approach to supporting integration and facilitating knowledge exchange through the development of “communities of practice”.

Design/methodology/approach
The paper describes a “communities of practice” model, as implemented by researchers from King's College London and Revolving Doors Agency through their Communities of Practice Development Programme. It outlines potential benefits of the model – identified through focus groups and survey responses of members, facilitator interviews and the authors’ observations as community of practice members. Finally, it discusses challenges and limitations of this approach.

Findings
Communities of practice are able to provide a forum for peer support and supervision to mediate feelings of role or service isolation and to sustain practitioner motivation. They can also facilitate inter-disciplinary and inter-agency knowledge transfer. However, the limited resources available to these local networks act as a barrier to developing their capacity to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.

Originality/value
The paper uses a case study approach to outline the potential for a “communities of practice” approach to be used to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-144
Number of pages13
JournalAdvances in Dual Diagnosis
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dual (Psychiatry) Diagnosis
Social Planning
Public Policy
Focus Groups
Motivation
Emotions
Research Personnel
Interviews
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • dual diagnosis
  • workforce development
  • integration
  • complex needs
  • multiple needs
  • networks

Cite this

Anderson, Sarah E. ; Hennessy, Catherine ; Cornes, Michelle ; Manthorpe, Jill. / Developing inter-disciplinary and inter-agency networks : reflections on a “community of practice” approach. In: Advances in Dual Diagnosis. 2013 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 132-144.
@article{60c7956901db4d4fb487fb7831039154,
title = "Developing inter-disciplinary and inter-agency networks: reflections on a “community of practice” approach",
abstract = "PurposePeople with a dual diagnosis or other multiple and complex needs often require support from a range of services and agencies. Social policy has focused on achieving an integrated response from practitioners; however, service responses to this group frequently remain fragmented. Practitioners supporting these clients are likely to need knowledge drawn from multiple disciplines and awareness of complex and changing services. Research suggests the value of professional networks for knowledge transfer. The purpose of this paper is to describe one's approach to supporting integration and facilitating knowledge exchange through the development of “communities of practice”.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes a “communities of practice” model, as implemented by researchers from King's College London and Revolving Doors Agency through their Communities of Practice Development Programme. It outlines potential benefits of the model – identified through focus groups and survey responses of members, facilitator interviews and the authors’ observations as community of practice members. Finally, it discusses challenges and limitations of this approach.FindingsCommunities of practice are able to provide a forum for peer support and supervision to mediate feelings of role or service isolation and to sustain practitioner motivation. They can also facilitate inter-disciplinary and inter-agency knowledge transfer. However, the limited resources available to these local networks act as a barrier to developing their capacity to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.Originality/valueThe paper uses a case study approach to outline the potential for a “communities of practice” approach to be used to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.",
keywords = "dual diagnosis, workforce development, integration, complex needs, multiple needs, networks",
author = "Anderson, {Sarah E.} and Catherine Hennessy and Michelle Cornes and Jill Manthorpe",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/ADD-05-2013-0013",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "132--144",
journal = "Advances in Dual Diagnosis",
issn = "1757-0972",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "3",

}

Developing inter-disciplinary and inter-agency networks : reflections on a “community of practice” approach. / Anderson, Sarah E.; Hennessy, Catherine; Cornes, Michelle; Manthorpe, Jill.

In: Advances in Dual Diagnosis, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2013, p. 132-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing inter-disciplinary and inter-agency networks

T2 - reflections on a “community of practice” approach

AU - Anderson, Sarah E.

AU - Hennessy, Catherine

AU - Cornes, Michelle

AU - Manthorpe, Jill

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - PurposePeople with a dual diagnosis or other multiple and complex needs often require support from a range of services and agencies. Social policy has focused on achieving an integrated response from practitioners; however, service responses to this group frequently remain fragmented. Practitioners supporting these clients are likely to need knowledge drawn from multiple disciplines and awareness of complex and changing services. Research suggests the value of professional networks for knowledge transfer. The purpose of this paper is to describe one's approach to supporting integration and facilitating knowledge exchange through the development of “communities of practice”.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes a “communities of practice” model, as implemented by researchers from King's College London and Revolving Doors Agency through their Communities of Practice Development Programme. It outlines potential benefits of the model – identified through focus groups and survey responses of members, facilitator interviews and the authors’ observations as community of practice members. Finally, it discusses challenges and limitations of this approach.FindingsCommunities of practice are able to provide a forum for peer support and supervision to mediate feelings of role or service isolation and to sustain practitioner motivation. They can also facilitate inter-disciplinary and inter-agency knowledge transfer. However, the limited resources available to these local networks act as a barrier to developing their capacity to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.Originality/valueThe paper uses a case study approach to outline the potential for a “communities of practice” approach to be used to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.

AB - PurposePeople with a dual diagnosis or other multiple and complex needs often require support from a range of services and agencies. Social policy has focused on achieving an integrated response from practitioners; however, service responses to this group frequently remain fragmented. Practitioners supporting these clients are likely to need knowledge drawn from multiple disciplines and awareness of complex and changing services. Research suggests the value of professional networks for knowledge transfer. The purpose of this paper is to describe one's approach to supporting integration and facilitating knowledge exchange through the development of “communities of practice”.Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes a “communities of practice” model, as implemented by researchers from King's College London and Revolving Doors Agency through their Communities of Practice Development Programme. It outlines potential benefits of the model – identified through focus groups and survey responses of members, facilitator interviews and the authors’ observations as community of practice members. Finally, it discusses challenges and limitations of this approach.FindingsCommunities of practice are able to provide a forum for peer support and supervision to mediate feelings of role or service isolation and to sustain practitioner motivation. They can also facilitate inter-disciplinary and inter-agency knowledge transfer. However, the limited resources available to these local networks act as a barrier to developing their capacity to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.Originality/valueThe paper uses a case study approach to outline the potential for a “communities of practice” approach to be used to improve responses to people with multiple and complex needs.

KW - dual diagnosis

KW - workforce development

KW - integration

KW - complex needs

KW - multiple needs

KW - networks

U2 - 10.1108/ADD-05-2013-0013

DO - 10.1108/ADD-05-2013-0013

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 132

EP - 144

JO - Advances in Dual Diagnosis

JF - Advances in Dual Diagnosis

SN - 1757-0972

IS - 3

ER -