Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation

Debbie Tolson, Jean McIntosh, Linda A Loftus, Paul Cormie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The attainment of evidence-based practice is at the fore of the international practice development agenda. It is therefore imperative that robust evaluation methodologies are available to scrutinise new approaches to service development.

OBJECTIVES: This paper reflects on the merits and challenges of realistic evaluation design in the establishment of a new managed clinical network (MCN) approach to implementing a guideline concerned with the care of individuals with cancer-related pain.

DESIGN AND METHODS: There were three evaluation points scrutinising three versions of the MCN approach to care. At each stage, steps were taken to identify the context, mechanisms and outcomes associated with the version of the model under scrutiny. Findings from patient-centred case studies fed into realistic evaluation interviews with the management group.

SETTING: A rural primary care setting in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS: Three older men, their families, and the doctors and nurses providing direct care participated, along with 13 members of the network management group.

RESULTS: The investigation highlighted the level of practitioner effort required to introduce the MCN approach to care. Progress was much slower than anticipated, at times frustrated by inexperience in change management and unfamiliarity with leading practice development projects and supporting practitioner learning. Issues to do with the age appropriateness of the evidence base in relation to the care of frail older people were also apparent. The professional group that experienced most role change were district nurses and community pharmacists.

CONCLUSION: The collaborative approach nurtured by the realistic evaluation framework was found particularly helpful and there was consensus that the evaluation had become integral to the intervention itself. There were a number of methodological challenges and a need to limit the depth of 'realistic unravelling'. However, as a formative approach, in the messy world of interdisciplinary practice development, realistic evaluation proved a worthy design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-95
Number of pages13
JournalInternational journal of nursing studies
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Nurses
Evidence-Based Practice
Scotland
Pharmacists
Primary Health Care
Consensus
Learning
Guidelines
Interviews

Keywords

  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Critical Pathways
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Health Services Research
  • Humans
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • Neoplasms
  • Nursing Evaluation Research
  • Organizational Innovation
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Pain
  • Palliative Care
  • Patient Care Team
  • Pharmacies
  • Pilot Projects
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Primary Health Care
  • Professional Role
  • Program Development
  • Program Evaluation
  • Public Health Nursing
  • Research Design
  • Rural Health Services
  • Scotland

Cite this

Tolson, Debbie ; McIntosh, Jean ; Loftus, Linda A ; Cormie, Paul. / Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care : a realistic evaluation. In: International journal of nursing studies. 2007 ; Vol. 44, No. 2. pp. 183-95.
@article{af486220e0fd4bc0a659668efff53194,
title = "Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The attainment of evidence-based practice is at the fore of the international practice development agenda. It is therefore imperative that robust evaluation methodologies are available to scrutinise new approaches to service development.OBJECTIVES: This paper reflects on the merits and challenges of realistic evaluation design in the establishment of a new managed clinical network (MCN) approach to implementing a guideline concerned with the care of individuals with cancer-related pain.DESIGN AND METHODS: There were three evaluation points scrutinising three versions of the MCN approach to care. At each stage, steps were taken to identify the context, mechanisms and outcomes associated with the version of the model under scrutiny. Findings from patient-centred case studies fed into realistic evaluation interviews with the management group.SETTING: A rural primary care setting in Scotland.PARTICIPANTS: Three older men, their families, and the doctors and nurses providing direct care participated, along with 13 members of the network management group.RESULTS: The investigation highlighted the level of practitioner effort required to introduce the MCN approach to care. Progress was much slower than anticipated, at times frustrated by inexperience in change management and unfamiliarity with leading practice development projects and supporting practitioner learning. Issues to do with the age appropriateness of the evidence base in relation to the care of frail older people were also apparent. The professional group that experienced most role change were district nurses and community pharmacists.CONCLUSION: The collaborative approach nurtured by the realistic evaluation framework was found particularly helpful and there was consensus that the evaluation had become integral to the intervention itself. There were a number of methodological challenges and a need to limit the depth of 'realistic unravelling'. However, as a formative approach, in the messy world of interdisciplinary practice development, realistic evaluation proved a worthy design.",
keywords = "Cooperative Behavior, Critical Pathways, Diffusion of Innovation, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Services Research, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Neoplasms, Nursing Evaluation Research, Organizational Innovation, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Pain, Palliative Care, Patient Care Team, Pharmacies, Pilot Projects, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Primary Health Care, Professional Role, Program Development, Program Evaluation, Public Health Nursing, Research Design, Rural Health Services, Scotland",
author = "Debbie Tolson and Jean McIntosh and Loftus, {Linda A} and Paul Cormie",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.027",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "183--95",
journal = "International journal of nursing studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "2",

}

Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care : a realistic evaluation. / Tolson, Debbie; McIntosh, Jean; Loftus, Linda A; Cormie, Paul.

In: International journal of nursing studies, Vol. 44, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 183-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care

T2 - a realistic evaluation

AU - Tolson, Debbie

AU - McIntosh, Jean

AU - Loftus, Linda A

AU - Cormie, Paul

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: The attainment of evidence-based practice is at the fore of the international practice development agenda. It is therefore imperative that robust evaluation methodologies are available to scrutinise new approaches to service development.OBJECTIVES: This paper reflects on the merits and challenges of realistic evaluation design in the establishment of a new managed clinical network (MCN) approach to implementing a guideline concerned with the care of individuals with cancer-related pain.DESIGN AND METHODS: There were three evaluation points scrutinising three versions of the MCN approach to care. At each stage, steps were taken to identify the context, mechanisms and outcomes associated with the version of the model under scrutiny. Findings from patient-centred case studies fed into realistic evaluation interviews with the management group.SETTING: A rural primary care setting in Scotland.PARTICIPANTS: Three older men, their families, and the doctors and nurses providing direct care participated, along with 13 members of the network management group.RESULTS: The investigation highlighted the level of practitioner effort required to introduce the MCN approach to care. Progress was much slower than anticipated, at times frustrated by inexperience in change management and unfamiliarity with leading practice development projects and supporting practitioner learning. Issues to do with the age appropriateness of the evidence base in relation to the care of frail older people were also apparent. The professional group that experienced most role change were district nurses and community pharmacists.CONCLUSION: The collaborative approach nurtured by the realistic evaluation framework was found particularly helpful and there was consensus that the evaluation had become integral to the intervention itself. There were a number of methodological challenges and a need to limit the depth of 'realistic unravelling'. However, as a formative approach, in the messy world of interdisciplinary practice development, realistic evaluation proved a worthy design.

AB - BACKGROUND: The attainment of evidence-based practice is at the fore of the international practice development agenda. It is therefore imperative that robust evaluation methodologies are available to scrutinise new approaches to service development.OBJECTIVES: This paper reflects on the merits and challenges of realistic evaluation design in the establishment of a new managed clinical network (MCN) approach to implementing a guideline concerned with the care of individuals with cancer-related pain.DESIGN AND METHODS: There were three evaluation points scrutinising three versions of the MCN approach to care. At each stage, steps were taken to identify the context, mechanisms and outcomes associated with the version of the model under scrutiny. Findings from patient-centred case studies fed into realistic evaluation interviews with the management group.SETTING: A rural primary care setting in Scotland.PARTICIPANTS: Three older men, their families, and the doctors and nurses providing direct care participated, along with 13 members of the network management group.RESULTS: The investigation highlighted the level of practitioner effort required to introduce the MCN approach to care. Progress was much slower than anticipated, at times frustrated by inexperience in change management and unfamiliarity with leading practice development projects and supporting practitioner learning. Issues to do with the age appropriateness of the evidence base in relation to the care of frail older people were also apparent. The professional group that experienced most role change were district nurses and community pharmacists.CONCLUSION: The collaborative approach nurtured by the realistic evaluation framework was found particularly helpful and there was consensus that the evaluation had become integral to the intervention itself. There were a number of methodological challenges and a need to limit the depth of 'realistic unravelling'. However, as a formative approach, in the messy world of interdisciplinary practice development, realistic evaluation proved a worthy design.

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Critical Pathways

KW - Diffusion of Innovation

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Health Services Research

KW - Humans

KW - Interprofessional Relations

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Nursing Evaluation Research

KW - Organizational Innovation

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Pain

KW - Palliative Care

KW - Patient Care Team

KW - Pharmacies

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Professional Role

KW - Program Development

KW - Program Evaluation

KW - Public Health Nursing

KW - Research Design

KW - Rural Health Services

KW - Scotland

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.027

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.027

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 183

EP - 195

JO - International journal of nursing studies

JF - International journal of nursing studies

SN - 0020-7489

IS - 2

ER -