Cross Sectoral Moderation as a Means of Promoting Communities of Practice

Lynne Grant-McMahon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Joint sector collaboration through the introduction of moderation events increase teacher confidence in the assessment judgements of the other sector and builds sustainable communities of practice. This research was conducted over a four-year period involving 518 participants: teaching staff, head teachers, and education authority quality improvement officers. Participants agreed to parts of the moderation events being recorded and also provided short written comments after each event. Focus groups were employed as a means investigating staff opinion of the other sector and of monitoring any changing opinion over the life of the project. A total of 56 participants volunteered to keep logs for a period of 6 months following their initial involvement with cross-sectoral moderation. The aims of this research included: * encouraging open discussion about teaching methods and assessment criteria, * providing a cross-sector forum for staff to grade and discuss samples of work, * establishing a model of moderation that could be used across the authority, * investigating the opinions each sector held about the other. The research examines various aspects of moderation and concludes that moderation when used for future enhancement does aid the formation of sustainable communities of practice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Learning
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

event
staff
community
assessment criteria
teacher
teaching method
confidence
monitoring
education
Group

Cite this

@article{f04f61d4c7e642998da2b7234188c7c5,
title = "Cross Sectoral Moderation as a Means of Promoting Communities of Practice",
abstract = "Joint sector collaboration through the introduction of moderation events increase teacher confidence in the assessment judgements of the other sector and builds sustainable communities of practice. This research was conducted over a four-year period involving 518 participants: teaching staff, head teachers, and education authority quality improvement officers. Participants agreed to parts of the moderation events being recorded and also provided short written comments after each event. Focus groups were employed as a means investigating staff opinion of the other sector and of monitoring any changing opinion over the life of the project. A total of 56 participants volunteered to keep logs for a period of 6 months following their initial involvement with cross-sectoral moderation. The aims of this research included: * encouraging open discussion about teaching methods and assessment criteria, * providing a cross-sector forum for staff to grade and discuss samples of work, * establishing a model of moderation that could be used across the authority, * investigating the opinions each sector held about the other. The research examines various aspects of moderation and concludes that moderation when used for future enhancement does aid the formation of sustainable communities of practice.",
author = "Lynne Grant-McMahon",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Learning",
issn = "1447-9494",
publisher = "Common Ground Research Networks",

}

Cross Sectoral Moderation as a Means of Promoting Communities of Practice. / Grant-McMahon, Lynne.

In: International Journal of Learning, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross Sectoral Moderation as a Means of Promoting Communities of Practice

AU - Grant-McMahon, Lynne

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Joint sector collaboration through the introduction of moderation events increase teacher confidence in the assessment judgements of the other sector and builds sustainable communities of practice. This research was conducted over a four-year period involving 518 participants: teaching staff, head teachers, and education authority quality improvement officers. Participants agreed to parts of the moderation events being recorded and also provided short written comments after each event. Focus groups were employed as a means investigating staff opinion of the other sector and of monitoring any changing opinion over the life of the project. A total of 56 participants volunteered to keep logs for a period of 6 months following their initial involvement with cross-sectoral moderation. The aims of this research included: * encouraging open discussion about teaching methods and assessment criteria, * providing a cross-sector forum for staff to grade and discuss samples of work, * establishing a model of moderation that could be used across the authority, * investigating the opinions each sector held about the other. The research examines various aspects of moderation and concludes that moderation when used for future enhancement does aid the formation of sustainable communities of practice.

AB - Joint sector collaboration through the introduction of moderation events increase teacher confidence in the assessment judgements of the other sector and builds sustainable communities of practice. This research was conducted over a four-year period involving 518 participants: teaching staff, head teachers, and education authority quality improvement officers. Participants agreed to parts of the moderation events being recorded and also provided short written comments after each event. Focus groups were employed as a means investigating staff opinion of the other sector and of monitoring any changing opinion over the life of the project. A total of 56 participants volunteered to keep logs for a period of 6 months following their initial involvement with cross-sectoral moderation. The aims of this research included: * encouraging open discussion about teaching methods and assessment criteria, * providing a cross-sector forum for staff to grade and discuss samples of work, * establishing a model of moderation that could be used across the authority, * investigating the opinions each sector held about the other. The research examines various aspects of moderation and concludes that moderation when used for future enhancement does aid the formation of sustainable communities of practice.

UR - http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/abstract?site=eds&scope=site&jrnl=14479494&AN=88379452&h=S6pEDDmklveWrJrmwjTC6WEo10mAD4DYxOQAeDbkGCg4Sl6WqeTt9YfIiUQ7CvC6hP2ig7TPmHmDvnm%2bVDzx8Q%3d%3d&crl=c&resultLocal=ErrCrlNoResults&resultNs=Ehost&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d14479494%26AN%3d88379452

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Learning

JF - International Journal of Learning

SN - 1447-9494

ER -