Cross-cultural comparisons of drinking motives in 10 countries: Data from the DRINC Project

Sean Mackinnon, Marie-Eve Couture, Lynne Cooper, Emanuel Kuntsche, Roisin O'Connor, Sherry Stewart, DRINC Team

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction and Aims. This study tested the measurement invariance of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised Short Form (DMQ-R-SF) in undergraduates across 10 countries. We expected the four-factor structure to hold across countries, and for social motives to emerge as the most commonly endorsed motive, followed by enhancement, coping, and conformity motives. We also compared individualistic and collectivistic countries to examine potential differences in the endorsement of drinking motives when countries were divided according to this broad cultural value. 
Design and Methods.A sample of 8,478 undergraduate drinkers from collectivistic (Portugal, Mexico, Brazil, Spain; n = 1567) and individualistic (Switzerland, Hungary, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland, and the United States; n = 6911) countries completed the DMQ-R-SF. Countries were classified as individualistic or collectivistic based on Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov [1].
Results.Using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, the 4-factor model of the DMQ-R-SF showed configural and metric invariance across all 10 countries. As predicted, the rank order of undergraduates’ drinking motive endorsement was identical across countries (social > enhancement > coping > conformity), although a mixed model ANOVA revealed a significant interaction where undergraduates from individualistic countries more strongly endorsed social and enhancement motives relative to undergraduates from collectivistic countries.
Discussion and Conclusions. There was broad cross-cultural consistency in the factor structure and mean patterns of drinking motives. Undergraduate students appear to drink mainly for positive reinforcement (i.e., for social and enhancement reasons), though this tendency is particularly pronounced among those from more individualistic countries.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDrug and Alcohol Review
Early online date23 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Cross-Cultural Comparison
intercultural comparison
Drinking
conformity
Portugal
Hungary
questionnaire
Mexico
Switzerland
Ireland
coping
Netherlands
Spain
Statistical Factor Analysis
Canada
Brazil
Analysis of Variance
Students
reinforcement
republic

Cite this

Mackinnon, Sean ; Couture, Marie-Eve ; Cooper, Lynne ; Kuntsche, Emanuel ; O'Connor, Roisin ; Stewart, Sherry ; Team, DRINC. / Cross-cultural comparisons of drinking motives in 10 countries : Data from the DRINC Project. In: Drug and Alcohol Review. 2017.
@article{28fdfbc38c6e47f1ae1ff83875b1cbdd,
title = "Cross-cultural comparisons of drinking motives in 10 countries: Data from the DRINC Project",
abstract = "Introduction and Aims. This study tested the measurement invariance of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised Short Form (DMQ-R-SF) in undergraduates across 10 countries. We expected the four-factor structure to hold across countries, and for social motives to emerge as the most commonly endorsed motive, followed by enhancement, coping, and conformity motives. We also compared individualistic and collectivistic countries to examine potential differences in the endorsement of drinking motives when countries were divided according to this broad cultural value. Design and Methods.A sample of 8,478 undergraduate drinkers from collectivistic (Portugal, Mexico, Brazil, Spain; n = 1567) and individualistic (Switzerland, Hungary, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland, and the United States; n = 6911) countries completed the DMQ-R-SF. Countries were classified as individualistic or collectivistic based on Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov [1].Results.Using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, the 4-factor model of the DMQ-R-SF showed configural and metric invariance across all 10 countries. As predicted, the rank order of undergraduates’ drinking motive endorsement was identical across countries (social > enhancement > coping > conformity), although a mixed model ANOVA revealed a significant interaction where undergraduates from individualistic countries more strongly endorsed social and enhancement motives relative to undergraduates from collectivistic countries.Discussion and Conclusions. There was broad cross-cultural consistency in the factor structure and mean patterns of drinking motives. Undergraduate students appear to drink mainly for positive reinforcement (i.e., for social and enhancement reasons), though this tendency is particularly pronounced among those from more individualistic countries.",
author = "Sean Mackinnon and Marie-Eve Couture and Lynne Cooper and Emanuel Kuntsche and Roisin O'Connor and Sherry Stewart and DRINC Team",
note = "12 months embargo",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1111/dar.12464",
language = "English",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Review",
issn = "1465-3362",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Inc.",

}

Cross-cultural comparisons of drinking motives in 10 countries : Data from the DRINC Project. / Mackinnon, Sean ; Couture, Marie-Eve; Cooper, Lynne; Kuntsche, Emanuel; O'Connor, Roisin; Stewart, Sherry; Team, DRINC.

In: Drug and Alcohol Review, 23.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural comparisons of drinking motives in 10 countries

T2 - Data from the DRINC Project

AU - Mackinnon, Sean

AU - Couture, Marie-Eve

AU - Cooper, Lynne

AU - Kuntsche, Emanuel

AU - O'Connor, Roisin

AU - Stewart, Sherry

AU - Team, DRINC

N1 - 12 months embargo

PY - 2017/3/23

Y1 - 2017/3/23

N2 - Introduction and Aims. This study tested the measurement invariance of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised Short Form (DMQ-R-SF) in undergraduates across 10 countries. We expected the four-factor structure to hold across countries, and for social motives to emerge as the most commonly endorsed motive, followed by enhancement, coping, and conformity motives. We also compared individualistic and collectivistic countries to examine potential differences in the endorsement of drinking motives when countries were divided according to this broad cultural value. Design and Methods.A sample of 8,478 undergraduate drinkers from collectivistic (Portugal, Mexico, Brazil, Spain; n = 1567) and individualistic (Switzerland, Hungary, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland, and the United States; n = 6911) countries completed the DMQ-R-SF. Countries were classified as individualistic or collectivistic based on Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov [1].Results.Using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, the 4-factor model of the DMQ-R-SF showed configural and metric invariance across all 10 countries. As predicted, the rank order of undergraduates’ drinking motive endorsement was identical across countries (social > enhancement > coping > conformity), although a mixed model ANOVA revealed a significant interaction where undergraduates from individualistic countries more strongly endorsed social and enhancement motives relative to undergraduates from collectivistic countries.Discussion and Conclusions. There was broad cross-cultural consistency in the factor structure and mean patterns of drinking motives. Undergraduate students appear to drink mainly for positive reinforcement (i.e., for social and enhancement reasons), though this tendency is particularly pronounced among those from more individualistic countries.

AB - Introduction and Aims. This study tested the measurement invariance of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised Short Form (DMQ-R-SF) in undergraduates across 10 countries. We expected the four-factor structure to hold across countries, and for social motives to emerge as the most commonly endorsed motive, followed by enhancement, coping, and conformity motives. We also compared individualistic and collectivistic countries to examine potential differences in the endorsement of drinking motives when countries were divided according to this broad cultural value. Design and Methods.A sample of 8,478 undergraduate drinkers from collectivistic (Portugal, Mexico, Brazil, Spain; n = 1567) and individualistic (Switzerland, Hungary, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland, and the United States; n = 6911) countries completed the DMQ-R-SF. Countries were classified as individualistic or collectivistic based on Hofstede, Hofstede, and Minkov [1].Results.Using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, the 4-factor model of the DMQ-R-SF showed configural and metric invariance across all 10 countries. As predicted, the rank order of undergraduates’ drinking motive endorsement was identical across countries (social > enhancement > coping > conformity), although a mixed model ANOVA revealed a significant interaction where undergraduates from individualistic countries more strongly endorsed social and enhancement motives relative to undergraduates from collectivistic countries.Discussion and Conclusions. There was broad cross-cultural consistency in the factor structure and mean patterns of drinking motives. Undergraduate students appear to drink mainly for positive reinforcement (i.e., for social and enhancement reasons), though this tendency is particularly pronounced among those from more individualistic countries.

U2 - 10.1111/dar.12464

DO - 10.1111/dar.12464

M3 - Article

JO - Drug and Alcohol Review

JF - Drug and Alcohol Review

SN - 1465-3362

ER -