Contrasting invasion patterns in intertidal and subtidal mussel communities

Lisa Skein, Mhairi Alexander, Tamara Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Two invasive mussel species are known from South Africa, Mytilus galloprovincialis and Semimytilus algosus. Most of the existing research on these invaders has focused on the intertidal zone, with little attention paid to subtidal habitats. This study addresses this knowledge gap by quantifying the relative abundance and size of native and alien mussels from the high-shore down to the subtidal zone, while accounting for the effects of wave exposure. This was achieved through extensive surveys along the west coast of South Africa and the Cape Peninsula. At all shore zones, mussel abundance varied among species and wave exposures. In intertidal habitats, invasive species were recorded in greatest abundances at wave-exposed sites. Specifically, M. galloprovincialis was dominant in the high-shore, but this pattern changed down the shore. In the mid-shore, the invaders were equally dominant over native mussels, while in the low-shore S. algosus became the most abundant. Notably, the native Choromytilus meridionalis was absent intertidally. In the subtidal zone M. galloprovincialis was rarely present, whereas S. algosus maintained a strong presence. The maximum size of native Aulacomya atra and invasive S. algosus in the subtidal zone was roughly double that recorded in the intertidal zone. Importantly, these results highlight that observations made from intertidal studies of mussel invasions cannot be used to infer subtidal patterns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-52
JournalAfrican Zoology
Volume53
Issue number1
Early online date20 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

mussels
Mytilus galloprovincialis
littoral zone
South Africa
habitats
invasive species
coasts

Cite this

Skein, Lisa ; Alexander, Mhairi ; Robinson, Tamara. / Contrasting invasion patterns in intertidal and subtidal mussel communities. In: African Zoology. 2018 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 47-52.
@article{4d7ccbb32267400d960f32087018edef,
title = "Contrasting invasion patterns in intertidal and subtidal mussel communities",
abstract = "Two invasive mussel species are known from South Africa, Mytilus galloprovincialis and Semimytilus algosus. Most of the existing research on these invaders has focused on the intertidal zone, with little attention paid to subtidal habitats. This study addresses this knowledge gap by quantifying the relative abundance and size of native and alien mussels from the high-shore down to the subtidal zone, while accounting for the effects of wave exposure. This was achieved through extensive surveys along the west coast of South Africa and the Cape Peninsula. At all shore zones, mussel abundance varied among species and wave exposures. In intertidal habitats, invasive species were recorded in greatest abundances at wave-exposed sites. Specifically, M. galloprovincialis was dominant in the high-shore, but this pattern changed down the shore. In the mid-shore, the invaders were equally dominant over native mussels, while in the low-shore S. algosus became the most abundant. Notably, the native Choromytilus meridionalis was absent intertidally. In the subtidal zone M. galloprovincialis was rarely present, whereas S. algosus maintained a strong presence. The maximum size of native Aulacomya atra and invasive S. algosus in the subtidal zone was roughly double that recorded in the intertidal zone. Importantly, these results highlight that observations made from intertidal studies of mussel invasions cannot be used to infer subtidal patterns.",
author = "Lisa Skein and Mhairi Alexander and Tamara Robinson",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/15627020.2018.1448720",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "47--52",
journal = "African Zoology",
issn = "1562-7020",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Contrasting invasion patterns in intertidal and subtidal mussel communities. / Skein, Lisa; Alexander, Mhairi; Robinson, Tamara.

In: African Zoology, Vol. 53, No. 1, 20.04.2018, p. 47-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting invasion patterns in intertidal and subtidal mussel communities

AU - Skein, Lisa

AU - Alexander, Mhairi

AU - Robinson, Tamara

PY - 2018/4/20

Y1 - 2018/4/20

N2 - Two invasive mussel species are known from South Africa, Mytilus galloprovincialis and Semimytilus algosus. Most of the existing research on these invaders has focused on the intertidal zone, with little attention paid to subtidal habitats. This study addresses this knowledge gap by quantifying the relative abundance and size of native and alien mussels from the high-shore down to the subtidal zone, while accounting for the effects of wave exposure. This was achieved through extensive surveys along the west coast of South Africa and the Cape Peninsula. At all shore zones, mussel abundance varied among species and wave exposures. In intertidal habitats, invasive species were recorded in greatest abundances at wave-exposed sites. Specifically, M. galloprovincialis was dominant in the high-shore, but this pattern changed down the shore. In the mid-shore, the invaders were equally dominant over native mussels, while in the low-shore S. algosus became the most abundant. Notably, the native Choromytilus meridionalis was absent intertidally. In the subtidal zone M. galloprovincialis was rarely present, whereas S. algosus maintained a strong presence. The maximum size of native Aulacomya atra and invasive S. algosus in the subtidal zone was roughly double that recorded in the intertidal zone. Importantly, these results highlight that observations made from intertidal studies of mussel invasions cannot be used to infer subtidal patterns.

AB - Two invasive mussel species are known from South Africa, Mytilus galloprovincialis and Semimytilus algosus. Most of the existing research on these invaders has focused on the intertidal zone, with little attention paid to subtidal habitats. This study addresses this knowledge gap by quantifying the relative abundance and size of native and alien mussels from the high-shore down to the subtidal zone, while accounting for the effects of wave exposure. This was achieved through extensive surveys along the west coast of South Africa and the Cape Peninsula. At all shore zones, mussel abundance varied among species and wave exposures. In intertidal habitats, invasive species were recorded in greatest abundances at wave-exposed sites. Specifically, M. galloprovincialis was dominant in the high-shore, but this pattern changed down the shore. In the mid-shore, the invaders were equally dominant over native mussels, while in the low-shore S. algosus became the most abundant. Notably, the native Choromytilus meridionalis was absent intertidally. In the subtidal zone M. galloprovincialis was rarely present, whereas S. algosus maintained a strong presence. The maximum size of native Aulacomya atra and invasive S. algosus in the subtidal zone was roughly double that recorded in the intertidal zone. Importantly, these results highlight that observations made from intertidal studies of mussel invasions cannot be used to infer subtidal patterns.

U2 - 10.1080/15627020.2018.1448720

DO - 10.1080/15627020.2018.1448720

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 47

EP - 52

JO - African Zoology

JF - African Zoology

SN - 1562-7020

IS - 1

ER -