Abstract
A singular ideal of the model employer can be seen to have shaped Human Resource Management (HRM), in the Anglo-American social and organisational contexts, in the past. In a period of change, and new conditions, redefinitions of what makes a model employer are prompting contemporary studies. Whether these identify a new ideal or not is the issue. On the one hand, these do have elements of a common agenda of concerns, suggesting a new ideal for employers to attain. But they also have differences, with competing or contradictory emphases in defining what a model employer is, and what HRM involves. A review of the factors associated with being a ''model employer'' is presented. This suggests tensions between a socially oriented and an organisationally oriented understanding of change in HRM. The theoretical framework of Social Construction is suggested as a way of understanding and engaging with these tensions as new models of good employers are evolved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 288-296 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- HRM
- model employers
- new deal
- theory
- human resource management
- social construction