TY - JOUR
T1 - Conspiring to decolonise language teaching and learning
T2 - reflections and reactions from a reading group
AU - Browning, Peter
AU - Highet, Katy
AU - Azada-Palacios, Rowena
AU - Douek, Tania
AU - Gong, Eleanor Yue
AU - Sunyol, Andrea
PY - 2022/11/16
Y1 - 2022/11/16
N2 - Within the spirit of conspiration, this article brings together contributions from participants of the PhD-led UCL Reading and React Group ‘Colonialism(s), Neoliberalism(s) and Language Teaching and Learning’, which ran in 2019/20. Weaving together various perspectives, the article centres on the dialogic nature of the decolonial enterprise and challenges the colonial concept of monologic authorial voice. Across the reflections on participants’ own engagements with questions of decolonising language teaching and learning, we pull together three threads: the inherent coloniality of the concepts that shape the very disciplines we seek to decolonise; the need to place decolonial efforts within broader contexts and to be sceptical of projects claiming to have completed the work of decolonising language teaching and learning; and the affordances and limitations offered to us by our positionalities, which the reflexivity of the conspirational encounter has allowed us to explore in some depth. The article closes with a reflection on the process of writing this article, and with the assertion that decolonising the curriculum is a multifaceted and open-ended process of dialogue and conspiration between practitioners and researchers alike.
AB - Within the spirit of conspiration, this article brings together contributions from participants of the PhD-led UCL Reading and React Group ‘Colonialism(s), Neoliberalism(s) and Language Teaching and Learning’, which ran in 2019/20. Weaving together various perspectives, the article centres on the dialogic nature of the decolonial enterprise and challenges the colonial concept of monologic authorial voice. Across the reflections on participants’ own engagements with questions of decolonising language teaching and learning, we pull together three threads: the inherent coloniality of the concepts that shape the very disciplines we seek to decolonise; the need to place decolonial efforts within broader contexts and to be sceptical of projects claiming to have completed the work of decolonising language teaching and learning; and the affordances and limitations offered to us by our positionalities, which the reflexivity of the conspirational encounter has allowed us to explore in some depth. The article closes with a reflection on the process of writing this article, and with the assertion that decolonising the curriculum is a multifaceted and open-ended process of dialogue and conspiration between practitioners and researchers alike.
KW - conspiration
KW - decolonising
KW - ELT
KW - language teaching
KW - neoliberalism
KW - positionality
KW - reflexivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143140166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14324/lre.20.1.42
DO - 10.14324/lre.20.1.42
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85143140166
SN - 1474-8460
VL - 20
JO - London Review of Education
JF - London Review of Education
IS - 1
M1 - 42
ER -