Conducting a traditional focus group

John Watson, Rick Newby, Helle Neergaard, Robert Smith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Much of the empirical research on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has relied heavily on cross-sectional survey methodologies (mail and/or telephone). However, as closed-ended questions effectively require appropriate pre-knowledge of the area under study they are less likely (compared to more qualitative, open-ended questions) to present an exhaustive picture of a relatively unknown area of interest. Worse still, asking closed-ended questions may simply result in confirming the researcher’s expectations without the researcher knowing that important detail is being missed. One way to generate broader qualitative data is through face-to-face interviews. However, Blackburn and Stokes (2000) argue that this method may suffer from the same inherent flaw as surveys, in that business owners may try to give an ‘expected’ answer rather than an accurate picture of themselves or their business. Blackburn and Stokes (2000) suggest that such difficulties can potentially be overcome through the use of a focus group approach because participants may feel more comfortable about sharing their feelings and experiences within a group of peers. The psychological security derived from group membership may be particularly relevant to researching owner-managers as it is likely that such individuals will be more open about their views when interacting with other owner-managers rather than in a one-on-one interview with a researcher (particularly if there is a perceived ‘culture gap’).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of qualitative research
Subtitle of host publicationtechniques and analysis in entrepreneurship
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages281-310
ISBN (Electronic)9781849809870
ISBN (Print)9781849809863
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

manager
Group
interview
group membership
telephone
empirical research
methodology
experience

Cite this

Watson, J., Newby, R., Neergaard, H., & Smith, R. (2015). Conducting a traditional focus group. In Handbook of qualitative research: techniques and analysis in entrepreneurship (pp. 281-310). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809870.00027
Watson, John ; Newby, Rick ; Neergaard, Helle ; Smith, Robert. / Conducting a traditional focus group. Handbook of qualitative research: techniques and analysis in entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. pp. 281-310
@inbook{ce767120b0934dac99990ac4e841be0b,
title = "Conducting a traditional focus group",
abstract = "Much of the empirical research on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has relied heavily on cross-sectional survey methodologies (mail and/or telephone). However, as closed-ended questions effectively require appropriate pre-knowledge of the area under study they are less likely (compared to more qualitative, open-ended questions) to present an exhaustive picture of a relatively unknown area of interest. Worse still, asking closed-ended questions may simply result in confirming the researcher’s expectations without the researcher knowing that important detail is being missed. One way to generate broader qualitative data is through face-to-face interviews. However, Blackburn and Stokes (2000) argue that this method may suffer from the same inherent flaw as surveys, in that business owners may try to give an ‘expected’ answer rather than an accurate picture of themselves or their business. Blackburn and Stokes (2000) suggest that such difficulties can potentially be overcome through the use of a focus group approach because participants may feel more comfortable about sharing their feelings and experiences within a group of peers. The psychological security derived from group membership may be particularly relevant to researching owner-managers as it is likely that such individuals will be more open about their views when interacting with other owner-managers rather than in a one-on-one interview with a researcher (particularly if there is a perceived ‘culture gap’).",
author = "John Watson and Rick Newby and Helle Neergaard and Robert Smith",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.4337/9781849809870.00027",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781849809863",
pages = "281--310",
booktitle = "Handbook of qualitative research",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Watson, J, Newby, R, Neergaard, H & Smith, R 2015, Conducting a traditional focus group. in Handbook of qualitative research: techniques and analysis in entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 281-310. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809870.00027

Conducting a traditional focus group. / Watson, John; Newby, Rick; Neergaard, Helle; Smith, Robert.

Handbook of qualitative research: techniques and analysis in entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. p. 281-310.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conducting a traditional focus group

AU - Watson, John

AU - Newby, Rick

AU - Neergaard, Helle

AU - Smith, Robert

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Much of the empirical research on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has relied heavily on cross-sectional survey methodologies (mail and/or telephone). However, as closed-ended questions effectively require appropriate pre-knowledge of the area under study they are less likely (compared to more qualitative, open-ended questions) to present an exhaustive picture of a relatively unknown area of interest. Worse still, asking closed-ended questions may simply result in confirming the researcher’s expectations without the researcher knowing that important detail is being missed. One way to generate broader qualitative data is through face-to-face interviews. However, Blackburn and Stokes (2000) argue that this method may suffer from the same inherent flaw as surveys, in that business owners may try to give an ‘expected’ answer rather than an accurate picture of themselves or their business. Blackburn and Stokes (2000) suggest that such difficulties can potentially be overcome through the use of a focus group approach because participants may feel more comfortable about sharing their feelings and experiences within a group of peers. The psychological security derived from group membership may be particularly relevant to researching owner-managers as it is likely that such individuals will be more open about their views when interacting with other owner-managers rather than in a one-on-one interview with a researcher (particularly if there is a perceived ‘culture gap’).

AB - Much of the empirical research on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has relied heavily on cross-sectional survey methodologies (mail and/or telephone). However, as closed-ended questions effectively require appropriate pre-knowledge of the area under study they are less likely (compared to more qualitative, open-ended questions) to present an exhaustive picture of a relatively unknown area of interest. Worse still, asking closed-ended questions may simply result in confirming the researcher’s expectations without the researcher knowing that important detail is being missed. One way to generate broader qualitative data is through face-to-face interviews. However, Blackburn and Stokes (2000) argue that this method may suffer from the same inherent flaw as surveys, in that business owners may try to give an ‘expected’ answer rather than an accurate picture of themselves or their business. Blackburn and Stokes (2000) suggest that such difficulties can potentially be overcome through the use of a focus group approach because participants may feel more comfortable about sharing their feelings and experiences within a group of peers. The psychological security derived from group membership may be particularly relevant to researching owner-managers as it is likely that such individuals will be more open about their views when interacting with other owner-managers rather than in a one-on-one interview with a researcher (particularly if there is a perceived ‘culture gap’).

U2 - 10.4337/9781849809870.00027

DO - 10.4337/9781849809870.00027

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781849809863

SP - 281

EP - 310

BT - Handbook of qualitative research

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -

Watson J, Newby R, Neergaard H, Smith R. Conducting a traditional focus group. In Handbook of qualitative research: techniques and analysis in entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2015. p. 281-310 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809870.00027