Concepts and issues in piezo-on-3D silicon structures

John Henry Sweet, David Hutson, Sandy Cochran, Anne Bernassau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore concepts and manufacturing issues for the emerging piezo on silicon technology being used in ultra‐sound devices. Development of 3D silicon‐on‐silicon structures is now under way. Additional functionality can be achieved using piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures and work in this area has started. A commercialisation road map is required, specifying development of the design and fabrication techniques from research to high volume and lower volume high‐value manufacture of niche products.

Design/methodology/approach
– This conceptual paper outlines processes needed, along with their possible sources with illustrations of present capabilities. Included are surface finishing techniques such as grinding, bonding technology for dissimilar materials, and through‐wafer‐via fabrication. Control of acoustic propagation, thermal expansion and electric field fringing effects will be considered.

Findings
– Areas that require research and development are identified with possible starting points using techniques already used in other applications. Strong emphasis on empirical research highlights possible issues with examples including surface finishing and wafer dicing to show current methods.

Research limitations/implications
– Archetypal pixellated piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures highlight critical points. In the authors' work, such pixellated structures occur in 1‐3 connectivity piezoelectric ceramic‐polymer composites with unit cell length scales from several millimetres, manufactured with mechanical dicing, to less than 50 μm, manufactured with micro‐moulding.

Practical implications
– A forward looking approach of “thinking freely” is taken, this opens up potential manufacturing routes and ideas precluded from an iterative approach.

Originality/value
– The conclusion suggests the criteria for a “design for” approach linked to either bottom up or top down assembly techniques for the integration of conventional and unusual piezoelectric materials with silicon in 3D structures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-332
JournalSensor Review
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Silicon
  • Piezoelectricity
  • Surface treatment

Cite this

Sweet, John Henry ; Hutson, David ; Cochran, Sandy ; Bernassau, Anne. / Concepts and issues in piezo-on-3D silicon structures. In: Sensor Review. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 326-332.
@article{d5dfdef189e6402e8acf5678943395ac,
title = "Concepts and issues in piezo-on-3D silicon structures",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to explore concepts and manufacturing issues for the emerging piezo on silicon technology being used in ultra‐sound devices. Development of 3D silicon‐on‐silicon structures is now under way. Additional functionality can be achieved using piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures and work in this area has started. A commercialisation road map is required, specifying development of the design and fabrication techniques from research to high volume and lower volume high‐value manufacture of niche products.Design/methodology/approach– This conceptual paper outlines processes needed, along with their possible sources with illustrations of present capabilities. Included are surface finishing techniques such as grinding, bonding technology for dissimilar materials, and through‐wafer‐via fabrication. Control of acoustic propagation, thermal expansion and electric field fringing effects will be considered.Findings– Areas that require research and development are identified with possible starting points using techniques already used in other applications. Strong emphasis on empirical research highlights possible issues with examples including surface finishing and wafer dicing to show current methods.Research limitations/implications– Archetypal pixellated piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures highlight critical points. In the authors' work, such pixellated structures occur in 1‐3 connectivity piezoelectric ceramic‐polymer composites with unit cell length scales from several millimetres, manufactured with mechanical dicing, to less than 50 μm, manufactured with micro‐moulding.Practical implications– A forward looking approach of “thinking freely” is taken, this opens up potential manufacturing routes and ideas precluded from an iterative approach.Originality/value– The conclusion suggests the criteria for a “design for” approach linked to either bottom up or top down assembly techniques for the integration of conventional and unusual piezoelectric materials with silicon in 3D structures.",
keywords = "Silicon, Piezoelectricity, Surface treatment",
author = "Sweet, {John Henry} and David Hutson and Sandy Cochran and Anne Bernassau",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/02602280910986566",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "326--332",
journal = "Sensor Review",
issn = "0260-2288",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

Concepts and issues in piezo-on-3D silicon structures. / Sweet, John Henry; Hutson, David; Cochran, Sandy; Bernassau, Anne.

In: Sensor Review, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2009, p. 326-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concepts and issues in piezo-on-3D silicon structures

AU - Sweet, John Henry

AU - Hutson, David

AU - Cochran, Sandy

AU - Bernassau, Anne

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to explore concepts and manufacturing issues for the emerging piezo on silicon technology being used in ultra‐sound devices. Development of 3D silicon‐on‐silicon structures is now under way. Additional functionality can be achieved using piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures and work in this area has started. A commercialisation road map is required, specifying development of the design and fabrication techniques from research to high volume and lower volume high‐value manufacture of niche products.Design/methodology/approach– This conceptual paper outlines processes needed, along with their possible sources with illustrations of present capabilities. Included are surface finishing techniques such as grinding, bonding technology for dissimilar materials, and through‐wafer‐via fabrication. Control of acoustic propagation, thermal expansion and electric field fringing effects will be considered.Findings– Areas that require research and development are identified with possible starting points using techniques already used in other applications. Strong emphasis on empirical research highlights possible issues with examples including surface finishing and wafer dicing to show current methods.Research limitations/implications– Archetypal pixellated piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures highlight critical points. In the authors' work, such pixellated structures occur in 1‐3 connectivity piezoelectric ceramic‐polymer composites with unit cell length scales from several millimetres, manufactured with mechanical dicing, to less than 50 μm, manufactured with micro‐moulding.Practical implications– A forward looking approach of “thinking freely” is taken, this opens up potential manufacturing routes and ideas precluded from an iterative approach.Originality/value– The conclusion suggests the criteria for a “design for” approach linked to either bottom up or top down assembly techniques for the integration of conventional and unusual piezoelectric materials with silicon in 3D structures.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to explore concepts and manufacturing issues for the emerging piezo on silicon technology being used in ultra‐sound devices. Development of 3D silicon‐on‐silicon structures is now under way. Additional functionality can be achieved using piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures and work in this area has started. A commercialisation road map is required, specifying development of the design and fabrication techniques from research to high volume and lower volume high‐value manufacture of niche products.Design/methodology/approach– This conceptual paper outlines processes needed, along with their possible sources with illustrations of present capabilities. Included are surface finishing techniques such as grinding, bonding technology for dissimilar materials, and through‐wafer‐via fabrication. Control of acoustic propagation, thermal expansion and electric field fringing effects will be considered.Findings– Areas that require research and development are identified with possible starting points using techniques already used in other applications. Strong emphasis on empirical research highlights possible issues with examples including surface finishing and wafer dicing to show current methods.Research limitations/implications– Archetypal pixellated piezoelectric‐on‐silicon structures highlight critical points. In the authors' work, such pixellated structures occur in 1‐3 connectivity piezoelectric ceramic‐polymer composites with unit cell length scales from several millimetres, manufactured with mechanical dicing, to less than 50 μm, manufactured with micro‐moulding.Practical implications– A forward looking approach of “thinking freely” is taken, this opens up potential manufacturing routes and ideas precluded from an iterative approach.Originality/value– The conclusion suggests the criteria for a “design for” approach linked to either bottom up or top down assembly techniques for the integration of conventional and unusual piezoelectric materials with silicon in 3D structures.

KW - Silicon

KW - Piezoelectricity

KW - Surface treatment

U2 - 10.1108/02602280910986566

DO - 10.1108/02602280910986566

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 326

EP - 332

JO - Sensor Review

JF - Sensor Review

SN - 0260-2288

IS - 4

ER -