Complement set focus without explicit quantity

Joanne Ingram, Linda M. Moxey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Production and comprehension of pronominal references may vary depending on whether this is preceded by a statement including a positive or a negative natural language quantifier (NLQ). After a negative NLQ there is a preference to refer to the complement set, a set not explicitly mentioned (Moxey & Sanford, 1987). We report two experiments which examine whether a property of the NLQ, or some alternative factor is responsible for this pattern of reference. According to the Presupposition Denial Account, complement set reference arises when the shortfall between a previously expected amount and a smaller amount, denoted by an NLQ, is made salient (Moxey, 2006). Using a character's implicit desire and positive versus negative emotion words, we manipulate the prominence of the shortfall. Results from a language production task show that when there is a large difference between what a character is likely to want and the amount that can be inferred from a negative emotion word there is an increase in production of complement set references. An eye movement study shows that, if a shortfall has been made salient in this way, a reference set reference leads to disruption during reading. These results are consistent with the Presupposition Denial Account.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-400
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date9 Mar 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Language
Emotions
Eye Movements
Reading
Quantifiers
Natural Language
Salient
Presupposition Denial
Emotion
Denial (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Complement set
  • Presupposition
  • Negation
  • Shortfall
  • Pronominal reference

Cite this

Ingram, Joanne ; Moxey, Linda M. / Complement set focus without explicit quantity. In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 383-400.
@article{000b416cca124fd88291186368b0eb67,
title = "Complement set focus without explicit quantity",
abstract = "Production and comprehension of pronominal references may vary depending on whether this is preceded by a statement including a positive or a negative natural language quantifier (NLQ). After a negative NLQ there is a preference to refer to the complement set, a set not explicitly mentioned (Moxey & Sanford, 1987). We report two experiments which examine whether a property of the NLQ, or some alternative factor is responsible for this pattern of reference. According to the Presupposition Denial Account, complement set reference arises when the shortfall between a previously expected amount and a smaller amount, denoted by an NLQ, is made salient (Moxey, 2006). Using a character's implicit desire and positive versus negative emotion words, we manipulate the prominence of the shortfall. Results from a language production task show that when there is a large difference between what a character is likely to want and the amount that can be inferred from a negative emotion word there is an increase in production of complement set references. An eye movement study shows that, if a shortfall has been made salient in this way, a reference set reference leads to disruption during reading. These results are consistent with the Presupposition Denial Account.",
keywords = "Complement set, Presupposition, Negation, Shortfall, Pronominal reference",
author = "Joanne Ingram and Moxey, {Linda M.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/20445911.2011.524202",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "383--400",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-5911",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Complement set focus without explicit quantity. / Ingram, Joanne; Moxey, Linda M.

In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2011, p. 383-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complement set focus without explicit quantity

AU - Ingram, Joanne

AU - Moxey, Linda M.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Production and comprehension of pronominal references may vary depending on whether this is preceded by a statement including a positive or a negative natural language quantifier (NLQ). After a negative NLQ there is a preference to refer to the complement set, a set not explicitly mentioned (Moxey & Sanford, 1987). We report two experiments which examine whether a property of the NLQ, or some alternative factor is responsible for this pattern of reference. According to the Presupposition Denial Account, complement set reference arises when the shortfall between a previously expected amount and a smaller amount, denoted by an NLQ, is made salient (Moxey, 2006). Using a character's implicit desire and positive versus negative emotion words, we manipulate the prominence of the shortfall. Results from a language production task show that when there is a large difference between what a character is likely to want and the amount that can be inferred from a negative emotion word there is an increase in production of complement set references. An eye movement study shows that, if a shortfall has been made salient in this way, a reference set reference leads to disruption during reading. These results are consistent with the Presupposition Denial Account.

AB - Production and comprehension of pronominal references may vary depending on whether this is preceded by a statement including a positive or a negative natural language quantifier (NLQ). After a negative NLQ there is a preference to refer to the complement set, a set not explicitly mentioned (Moxey & Sanford, 1987). We report two experiments which examine whether a property of the NLQ, or some alternative factor is responsible for this pattern of reference. According to the Presupposition Denial Account, complement set reference arises when the shortfall between a previously expected amount and a smaller amount, denoted by an NLQ, is made salient (Moxey, 2006). Using a character's implicit desire and positive versus negative emotion words, we manipulate the prominence of the shortfall. Results from a language production task show that when there is a large difference between what a character is likely to want and the amount that can be inferred from a negative emotion word there is an increase in production of complement set references. An eye movement study shows that, if a shortfall has been made salient in this way, a reference set reference leads to disruption during reading. These results are consistent with the Presupposition Denial Account.

KW - Complement set

KW - Presupposition

KW - Negation

KW - Shortfall

KW - Pronominal reference

U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2011.524202

DO - 10.1080/20445911.2011.524202

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 383

EP - 400

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-5911

IS - 3

ER -