Comparing six modeling approaches

Gunter Mussbacher; Wisam Al Abed; Omar Alam; Shaukat Ali; Antoine Beugnard; Valentin Bonnet; Rolv Bræk; Alfredo Capozucca; Betty H. C. Cheng; Urooj Fatima; Robert France; Geri Georg; Nicolas Guelfi; Paul Istoan; Jean Marc Jézéquel; Jörg Kienzle; Jacques Klein; Jean Baptiste Lézoray; Somayeh Malakuti; Ana Moreira; An Phung-Khac; Lucy Troup

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22

Comparing six modeling approaches

Gunter Mussbacher^*, Wisam Al Abed, Omar Alam, Shaukat Ali, Antoine Beugnard, Valentin Bonnet, Rolv Bræk, Alfredo Capozucca, Betty H. C. Cheng, Urooj Fatima, Robert France, Geri Georg, Nicolas Guelfi, Paul Istoan, Jean Marc Jézéquel, Jörg Kienzle, Jacques Klein, Jean Baptiste Lézoray, Somayeh Malakuti, Ana MoreiraAn Phung-Khac, Lucy Troup

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While there are many aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) approaches, from requirements to low-level design, it is still difficult to compare them and know under which conditions different approaches are most applicable. This comparison, however, is crucially important to unify existing AOM and more traditional object-oriented modeling (OOM) approaches and to generalize individual approaches into a comprehensive end-to-end method. Such a method does not yet exist. This paper reports on work done at the inaugural Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive methodologies: (i) a common, focused case study for six modeling approaches, (ii) a set of criteria applied to each of the six approaches, and (iii) the assessment results.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Models in Software Engineering
Subtitle of host publication	Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, October 16-21, 2011, Reports and Revised Selected Papers
Editors	Jorg Kienzle
Publisher	Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Pages	217-243
Number of pages	27
ISBN (Electronic)	9783642296451
ISBN (Print)	9783642296444
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22
Publication status	Published - 10 May 2012
Externally published	Yes
Event	Workshops and Symposia on Models in Software Engineering, MODELS 2011 - Wellington, New Zealand Duration: 16 Oct 2011 → 21 Oct 2011

Publication series

Name	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume	7167 LNCS
ISSN (Print)	0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)	1611-3349

Conference

Conference	Workshops and Symposia on Models in Software Engineering, MODELS 2011
Country/Territory	New Zealand
City	Wellington
Period	16/10/11 → 21/10/11

Keywords

aspect-oriented modeling
case study
comparison criteria
object-oriented modeling

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22

Cite this

Mussbacher, G., Al Abed, W., Alam, O., Ali, S., Beugnard, A., Bonnet, V., Bræk, R., Capozucca, A., Cheng, B. H. C., Fatima, U., France, R., Georg, G., Guelfi, N., Istoan, P., Jézéquel, J. M., Kienzle, J., Klein, J., Lézoray, J. B., Malakuti, S., ... Troup, L. (2012). Comparing six modeling approaches. In J. Kienzle (Ed.), Models in Software Engineering: Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, October 16-21, 2011, Reports and Revised Selected Papers (pp. 217-243). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 7167 LNCS). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22

Mussbacher, Gunter ; Al Abed, Wisam ; Alam, Omar et al. / Comparing six modeling approaches. Models in Software Engineering: Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, October 16-21, 2011, Reports and Revised Selected Papers. editor / Jorg Kienzle. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. pp. 217-243 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).

@inproceedings{d28cb97a73af40a8b32dd92b31849730,

title = "Comparing six modeling approaches",

abstract = "While there are many aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) approaches, from requirements to low-level design, it is still difficult to compare them and know under which conditions different approaches are most applicable. This comparison, however, is crucially important to unify existing AOM and more traditional object-oriented modeling (OOM) approaches and to generalize individual approaches into a comprehensive end-to-end method. Such a method does not yet exist. This paper reports on work done at the inaugural Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive methodologies: (i) a common, focused case study for six modeling approaches, (ii) a set of criteria applied to each of the six approaches, and (iii) the assessment results.",

keywords = "aspect-oriented modeling, case study, comparison criteria, object-oriented modeling",

author = "Gunter Mussbacher and {Al Abed}, Wisam and Omar Alam and Shaukat Ali and Antoine Beugnard and Valentin Bonnet and Rolv Br{\ae}k and Alfredo Capozucca and Cheng, {Betty H. C.} and Urooj Fatima and Robert France and Geri Georg and Nicolas Guelfi and Paul Istoan and J{\'e}z{\'e}quel, {Jean Marc} and J{\"o}rg Kienzle and Jacques Klein and L{\'e}zoray, {Jean Baptiste} and Somayeh Malakuti and Ana Moreira and An Phung-Khac and Lucy Troup",

year = "2012",

month = may,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783642296444",

series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

publisher = "Springer Berlin Heidelberg",

pages = "217--243",

editor = "Jorg Kienzle",

booktitle = "Models in Software Engineering",

address = "Germany",

note = "Workshops and Symposia on Models in Software Engineering, MODELS 2011 ; Conference date: 16-10-2011 Through 21-10-2011",

}

Mussbacher, G, Al Abed, W, Alam, O, Ali, S, Beugnard, A, Bonnet, V, Bræk, R, Capozucca, A, Cheng, BHC, Fatima, U, France, R, Georg, G, Guelfi, N, Istoan, P, Jézéquel, JM, Kienzle, J, Klein, J, Lézoray, JB, Malakuti, S, Moreira, A, Phung-Khac, A & Troup, L 2012, Comparing six modeling approaches. in J Kienzle (ed.), Models in Software Engineering: Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, October 16-21, 2011, Reports and Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 7167 LNCS, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 217-243, Workshops and Symposia on Models in Software Engineering, MODELS 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, 16/10/11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22

Comparing six modeling approaches. / Mussbacher, Gunter; Al Abed, Wisam; Alam, Omar et al.
Models in Software Engineering: Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, October 16-21, 2011, Reports and Revised Selected Papers. ed. / Jorg Kienzle. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. p. 217-243 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 7167 LNCS).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing six modeling approaches

AU - Mussbacher, Gunter

AU - Al Abed, Wisam

AU - Alam, Omar

AU - Ali, Shaukat

AU - Beugnard, Antoine

AU - Bonnet, Valentin

AU - Bræk, Rolv

AU - Capozucca, Alfredo

AU - Cheng, Betty H. C.

AU - Fatima, Urooj

AU - France, Robert

AU - Georg, Geri

AU - Guelfi, Nicolas

AU - Istoan, Paul

AU - Jézéquel, Jean Marc

AU - Kienzle, Jörg

AU - Klein, Jacques

AU - Lézoray, Jean Baptiste

AU - Malakuti, Somayeh

AU - Moreira, Ana

AU - Phung-Khac, An

AU - Troup, Lucy

PY - 2012/5/10

Y1 - 2012/5/10

N2 - While there are many aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) approaches, from requirements to low-level design, it is still difficult to compare them and know under which conditions different approaches are most applicable. This comparison, however, is crucially important to unify existing AOM and more traditional object-oriented modeling (OOM) approaches and to generalize individual approaches into a comprehensive end-to-end method. Such a method does not yet exist. This paper reports on work done at the inaugural Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive methodologies: (i) a common, focused case study for six modeling approaches, (ii) a set of criteria applied to each of the six approaches, and (iii) the assessment results.

AB - While there are many aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) approaches, from requirements to low-level design, it is still difficult to compare them and know under which conditions different approaches are most applicable. This comparison, however, is crucially important to unify existing AOM and more traditional object-oriented modeling (OOM) approaches and to generalize individual approaches into a comprehensive end-to-end method. Such a method does not yet exist. This paper reports on work done at the inaugural Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive methodologies: (i) a common, focused case study for six modeling approaches, (ii) a set of criteria applied to each of the six approaches, and (iii) the assessment results.

KW - aspect-oriented modeling

KW - case study

KW - comparison criteria

KW - object-oriented modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860632712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84860632712

SN - 9783642296444

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 217

EP - 243

BT - Models in Software Engineering

A2 - Kienzle, Jorg

PB - Springer Berlin Heidelberg

T2 - Workshops and Symposia on Models in Software Engineering, MODELS 2011

Y2 - 16 October 2011 through 21 October 2011

ER -

Mussbacher G, Al Abed W, Alam O, Ali S, Beugnard A, Bonnet V et al. Comparing six modeling approaches. In Kienzle J, editor, Models in Software Engineering: Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2011, Wellington, New Zealand, October 16-21, 2011, Reports and Revised Selected Papers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2012. p. 217-243. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_22

Comparing six modeling approaches

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this