Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cognitive behaviour therapy-trained staff’s views on professional accreditation

  • Ben Parkinson
  • , Douglas Marks

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    182 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Many cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) trained mental health professionals seek non-mandatory accreditation with the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP), despite self-regulation of talking therapies being a divisive issue. This raises the question: what views do CBT-trained mental health professionals have towards BABCP accreditation and what motivates them to become accredited? This qualitative study recruited seven postgraduate CBT-trained mental health professionals from NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde during 2015. Individual semi-structured interviews were completed and verbatim transcripts produced. Thematic analysis revealed the value participants place on accreditation, and that an absence of motivating factors and barriers during the application process means that not all CBT therapists become accredited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)27-32
    Number of pages6
    JournalMental Health Practice
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Sept 2017

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Accreditation
    • British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies
    • Self-regulation
    • Cognitive behaviour therapy
    • Professional development

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive behaviour therapy-trained staff’s views on professional accreditation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this