Closing the gap: how psychological distance influences willingness to engage in risky COVID behavior

Ceridwen Williams, Paul Rauwolf, Matt Boulter, John A. Parkinson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Pandemics, and other risk-related contexts, require dynamic changes in behavior as situations develop. Human behavior is influenced by both explicit (cognitive) and implicit (intuitive) factors. In this study, we used psychological distance as a lens to understand what influences our decision-making with regard to risk in the context of COVID-19. This study was based on the rationale that our relational needs are more concrete to us than the risk of the virus. First, we explored the impact of social–psychological distance on participants’ risk perceptions and behavioral willingness. As hypothesized, we found that close social relationships of agents promoted willingness to engage in risky behavior. In the second phase, we tested an intervention designed to increase the concreteness of information about virus transmission as a mechanism to mitigate the bias of social influence. We found that the concreteness intervention resulted in significantly reduced willingness to engage in risky behavior. As such, communications aimed at changing the behavior of citizens during times of increased risk or danger should consider conceptually concrete messaging when communicating complex risk, and hence may provide a valuable tool in promoting health-related behavior.
Original languageEnglish
Article number449
Number of pages14
JournalBehavioral Sciences
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2024

Keywords

  • psychological distance
  • construal level
  • behavior change
  • COVID-19

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Closing the gap: how psychological distance influences willingness to engage in risky COVID behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this