Classification of schizophrenia. Part 2: The nonsense of mental health illness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The classification of schizophrenia is currently under review in a coordinated worldwide consultation for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11)--the standard manuals for psychiatric classification. Classification can seem remote from nurses by appearing to be the antithesis of person-centred approaches to recovery. This should not be the case. Nurses need to critically engage with methods of classification in order to better understand the biological, psychological, social and political assumptions underpinning them. It will be shown that these assumptions often compete, and some common objections to the construct of schizophrenia can be viewed as a function of this. However, it is argued here that a truly holistic approach to care needs to engage with all these factors. The alternative is to simply reject the process as irrelevant to mental health nursing. It will be shown that a corollary of this latter approach is the invention of nonsense terms such as 'mental health illness' as a function of trying to simultaneously deny yet acknowledge the existence of mental illness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1228-32
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Nursing
Volume18
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Mental Health
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Nurses
Psychiatric Nursing
International Classification of Diseases
Psychiatry
Referral and Consultation
Psychology

Keywords

  • Algorithms
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Dissent and Disputes
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Great Britain
  • Humans
  • International Classification of Diseases
  • Philosophy, Medical
  • Psychiatric Nursing
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychoanalytic Theory
  • Schizophrenia
  • Semantics
  • Stereotyping
  • United States

Cite this

@article{d23369f8a9b34567a40842996f822d88,
title = "Classification of schizophrenia. Part 2: The nonsense of mental health illness",
abstract = "The classification of schizophrenia is currently under review in a coordinated worldwide consultation for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11)--the standard manuals for psychiatric classification. Classification can seem remote from nurses by appearing to be the antithesis of person-centred approaches to recovery. This should not be the case. Nurses need to critically engage with methods of classification in order to better understand the biological, psychological, social and political assumptions underpinning them. It will be shown that these assumptions often compete, and some common objections to the construct of schizophrenia can be viewed as a function of this. However, it is argued here that a truly holistic approach to care needs to engage with all these factors. The alternative is to simply reject the process as irrelevant to mental health nursing. It will be shown that a corollary of this latter approach is the invention of nonsense terms such as 'mental health illness' as a function of trying to simultaneously deny yet acknowledge the existence of mental illness.",
keywords = "Algorithms, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Dissent and Disputes, Evidence-Based Practice, Great Britain, Humans, International Classification of Diseases, Philosophy, Medical, Psychiatric Nursing, Psychiatry, Psychoanalytic Theory, Schizophrenia, Semantics, Stereotyping, United States",
author = "Austyn Snowden",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "19",
doi = "10.12968/bjon.2009.18.20.45113",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1228--32",
journal = "British Journal of Nursing",
issn = "0966-0461",
publisher = "Mark Allen Healthcare",
number = "20",

}

Classification of schizophrenia. Part 2 : The nonsense of mental health illness. / Snowden, Austyn.

In: British Journal of Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 20, 19.01.2010, p. 1228-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of schizophrenia. Part 2

T2 - The nonsense of mental health illness

AU - Snowden, Austyn

PY - 2010/1/19

Y1 - 2010/1/19

N2 - The classification of schizophrenia is currently under review in a coordinated worldwide consultation for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11)--the standard manuals for psychiatric classification. Classification can seem remote from nurses by appearing to be the antithesis of person-centred approaches to recovery. This should not be the case. Nurses need to critically engage with methods of classification in order to better understand the biological, psychological, social and political assumptions underpinning them. It will be shown that these assumptions often compete, and some common objections to the construct of schizophrenia can be viewed as a function of this. However, it is argued here that a truly holistic approach to care needs to engage with all these factors. The alternative is to simply reject the process as irrelevant to mental health nursing. It will be shown that a corollary of this latter approach is the invention of nonsense terms such as 'mental health illness' as a function of trying to simultaneously deny yet acknowledge the existence of mental illness.

AB - The classification of schizophrenia is currently under review in a coordinated worldwide consultation for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11)--the standard manuals for psychiatric classification. Classification can seem remote from nurses by appearing to be the antithesis of person-centred approaches to recovery. This should not be the case. Nurses need to critically engage with methods of classification in order to better understand the biological, psychological, social and political assumptions underpinning them. It will be shown that these assumptions often compete, and some common objections to the construct of schizophrenia can be viewed as a function of this. However, it is argued here that a truly holistic approach to care needs to engage with all these factors. The alternative is to simply reject the process as irrelevant to mental health nursing. It will be shown that a corollary of this latter approach is the invention of nonsense terms such as 'mental health illness' as a function of trying to simultaneously deny yet acknowledge the existence of mental illness.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

KW - Dissent and Disputes

KW - Evidence-Based Practice

KW - Great Britain

KW - Humans

KW - International Classification of Diseases

KW - Philosophy, Medical

KW - Psychiatric Nursing

KW - Psychiatry

KW - Psychoanalytic Theory

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Semantics

KW - Stereotyping

KW - United States

U2 - 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.20.45113

DO - 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.20.45113

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1228

EP - 1232

JO - British Journal of Nursing

JF - British Journal of Nursing

SN - 0966-0461

IS - 20

ER -